What's new

Following potential 2014 draftees

poythress would be a nice get with the second pick. can play the 3 or the 4. of course this all depends on who we get first.
 
I'm like, wow, that's like some good stuff in there. I'm gonna learn about this coach, geez, you know.

There is this coach in Germany you know like, he's speaken a English with a strong Serbian accent you know like.

Every coach/person speaks like that, obvi. Just a matter of whether the writer feels like cleaning it up.

Imagine a writer had to clean up this guy's language ;)
Whenever I watch/attend a press conference of him I try to keep track of his stats. He leads the league in 'you know like's per minute.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GQl5MI0FNs
 
poythress would be a nice get with the second pick. can play the 3 or the 4. of course this all depends on who we get first.

I'd probably prefer Aaron Harrison or James Young. I really want some serious 3 point shooting to surround Favors/Kanter with.

But who knows how any of these guys will pan out? I need the season to start already. Like, I NEED it.
 
A Calipari quote from yesterday that many will find controversial, I bet.

Yea not only is it controversial but stupid. There are screens in a pick and roll offense. I liked your list but wasn't Calipari at Memphis when they had violations?
 
Yea not only is it controversial but stupid. There are screens in a pick and roll offense. I liked your list but wasn't Calipari at Memphis when they had violations?

1) ncolorado was attacking UK, not Cal.. and UK has no violations.
2) the NCAA has publicly stated that there was no way Cal was involved in the DRose stuff. In fact, not even Memphis was involved.

The facts as EVERYONE agrees are as follows;

- IF DRose did cheat on his entrance exam, it was prior to even choosing a college. There was/is nothing at all implicit that Memphis was involved in it.
- The NCAA has absolutely zero proof, none, that DRose cheated. It was merely a rumor started more than a year later.
- When the rumor surfaced, the NCAA, in their infinite wisdom, sent a letter to DRose requiring him to PROVE he didn't cheat on the exam.
This had two problems;
A) how does one prove he didn't cheat?
B) by this time Rose was the starting PG for the Bulls and because he had NOTHING to lose either way, chose to give the NCAA the middle finger.
- because Rose failed to prove to the NCAA he didn't cheat they presumed guilt and ruled him academically ineligible.
- in doing so, the NCAA deemed Memphis to have played an ineligible player, slapped them with violations, and vacated wins for that year.
- one problem is that its the NCAA that has the clearinghouse that examines players records and gives the green light to a college to play a certain player, or not. And in this case Memphis was told Rose was cleared and good to go. So Memphis played him.

This is one of the most assinine cases of stupidity ever in sports, imo. The NCAA admits they have no proof. They admit they cleared Rose to play. They admit Rose took the exam before ever even choosing a college. They admit Memphis was not involved in the act .. if that act indeed happened. They then penalize an entire university, it's players, coaches, fans, etc for something one high school kid MAY have done.

Part of the outcry from media and other college coaches was, at the time, "why doesn't the NCAA penalize itself, or take responsibility for having cleared a player that they ALONE later deemed was ineligible. Awfully abusive and dumb for that org to have acted completely independently in both the clearing of, and ruling the ineligibility of, DRose... and decide to punish Memphis for it. Ridiculous.
 
poythress would be a nice get with the second pick. can play the 3 or the 4. of course this all depends on who we get first.

I'm over Poythress now. I loved him before last season. If he drops to early 2nd get him otherwise I'll pass.
 
I'm over Poythress now. I loved him before last season. If he drops to early 2nd get him otherwise I'll pass.

If you loved him before last season, but because of that season have since dropped him.. wouldn't it be smarter to say that you're currently not high on him but need to see how he plays this year?

Hint: this is the way I see it which is concrete evidence of it being smarter.
 
If you loved him before last season, but because of that season have since dropped him.. wouldn't it be smarter to say that you're currently not high on him but need to see how he plays this year?

Hint: this is the way I see it which is concrete evidence of it being smarter.

this is my stance but I think in the early 20s poythress is the kind of bench players teams need. he can play the 3 and the 4. he has the potential have monster games off the bench but dis appear in others.

now if the jazz got Parker or randle I wouldn't get poythress. if the got a wing or pg then poythress makes since.

it also depends on how Burke plays. if he is ROY material then 2 or 3 is more important. if favors plays passive then 4 or 5 become important. so many questions just let the season begin.
 
If you loved him before last season, but because of that season have since dropped him.. wouldn't it be smarter to say that you're currently not high on him but need to see how he plays this year?

Hint: this is the way I see it which is concrete evidence of it being smarter.

Nope. I failed in my evaluation. Time to move on.
 
Back
Top