What's new

Following potential 2014 draftees

Randle. That could change.. but Randle is special.

Everything as far as Andrew and Randle for me is speculation as I haven't seen either play.. I've seen more video's of Andrew then Randle. Just have this feeling Andrew could be in the Rose, Westbrook conversation. Am I way off here?

I know you hate player comps, but who would you compare Randle to in the nba?


Thanks PKM.
 
So, lets say the Jazz get the 3rd pick and Parker/Wiggins are gone. The consensus is Randle is the best player available, so you take him (obviously this all can change). If this comes to happen, then what do you do with Kanter/Favors. Do you keep both and have the nastiest PF/C group of 3 in the NBA, or do you trade one of them?

Now, knowing ahead of time that this draft is a possibility, could the Jazz trade one of them for another pick in next years draft? Would there be any players left on the board that would be worth trading straight up for Kanter or Favors?
 
So, lets say the Jazz get the 3rd pick and Parker/Wiggins are gone. The consensus is Randle is the best player available, so you take him (obviously this all can change). If this comes to happen, then what do you do with Kanter/Favors. Do you keep both and have the nastiest PF/C group of 3 in the NBA, or do you trade one of them?

Now, knowing ahead of time that this draft is a possibility, could the Jazz trade one of them for another pick in next years draft? Would there be any players left on the board that would be worth trading straight up for Kanter or Favors?

considering how favors is playing. I say move kanter to the bench and have burks and kanter anchor the second team. Favors defense with randles scoring on the first unit is dangerous
 
Not sure if serious....

yes and no

at first my thoughts were how bad favors is playing but still a decent defender

Randle, Kanter offensive players
Favors, Gobert Defensive

so it makes sense to seperate them

Right now Favors has more upside then Gobert.

Randle is better then them all
 
So, lets say the Jazz get the 3rd pick and Parker/Wiggins are gone. The consensus is Randle is the best player available, so you take him (obviously this all can change). If this comes to happen, then what do you do with Kanter/Favors. Do you keep both and have the nastiest PF/C group of 3 in the NBA, or do you trade one of them?

Now, knowing ahead of time that this draft is a possibility, could the Jazz trade one of them for another pick in next years draft? Would there be any players left on the board that would be worth trading straight up for Kanter or Favors?

I would keep all three for at least a couple years while Randle is on the rookie scale, depending, of course, on how things shake out over the rest of this season and next.
I would love to see that 3-man rotation, for sure.

considering how favors is playing. I say move kanter to the bench and have burks and kanter anchor the second team. Favors defense with randles scoring on the first unit is dangerous

I just don't see Kanter coming off the bench.. and not smart, imo, if you're planning to trade him.

also go hard for young

Burke, neto
Young, burke
Hayward
Randle, kanter
Favors, gobert

I could live with that

Young and Hayward would be exciting on the wings.

I just want this season to be over and for us to have a top two pick....

This. Click your heels.

Not sure if serious....

Pretty much. Sorry, Jako.

yes and no

at first my thoughts were how bad favors is playing but still a decent defender

Randle, Kanter offensive players
Favors, Gobert Defensive

so it makes sense to seperate them

Right now Favors has more upside then Gobert.

Randle is better then them all

He may be the best of that group.. his skillset, motor, work ethic/tenacity is off the charts. (not to mention hunger)
 
WCS only took 3 shots in his 20 minutes of play.

Very impressive athlete and agility..
3pts
6rbs
4asts
3stls
4blks
 
Back
Top