Sorry if this has been discussed, but if Smart is best available for the jazz could he make the move to sg, or is he strictly a pg?
I'm not even sure he knows what he is
Sorry if this has been discussed, but if Smart is best available for the jazz could he make the move to sg, or is he strictly a pg?
randle is not a tweener. he is 4. nothing but a 4.
Bro... an SG... or a "Shooting Guard" ... has to be able to "Shoot".
I think that answers your question.
A layup and a dunk also falls into the category shooting. So do free throws. Your logics is a little vague...(as usual)
Then I guess you would call Dwight a good shooter?
May be you'd play him at SG?
You're missing the point again. Let me tell you like this: Find me a legit coach who doesn't use the words wing, scoring guard or guard. And they will use shooting guard when they're speaking with the media so guys like you don't get confused...
More like you better use your brain while watching basketball and study some real basketball stuff before talking with dem big boys.
But you could also start wondering how every guy who was labeled a shooting guard and at the same time was bad at long range shooting could fit your description so you can feel right about your ridiculous statements.
LOL.. bro...you're talking to the guy who's gone and broke all the rules to label Randle a SF in the NBA...
... and now you're calling him out for saying a SG need to be able to shoot????
WTF is this??? Have I somehow fallen through some sort of rabbit hole and gone into a parallel universe of sort???????? Someone please WAKE ME!!!!!
So, now that the Jazz and Warriors look like they will win some games, let's talk about best case scenarios for the Worst case scenario (let's say picks 10 and 22).
Here are a few scenarios I see.
1. Trade GS pick and Jazz pick to move up in the draft. I don't see any team in the top 5 taking this deal. I think you could move up to 6 or 7 but who would it be for Smart, Gordon? If someone like Exum/Randle/Embiid dropped, I don't see any team trading down.
2. Trade our pick and a player. I like this scenario. Jazz have to think about signing these players in the future and I don't see them able to pay for Burke, Hayward, Favors, Burks, Kanter, 2013 1st round pick x2. How far could we move up with our pick plus Kanter? Burks? Is hayward even tradeable as an RFA? Burke and Favors are here to stay imo.
3. Trade our pick, GS pick and a player (plus maybe 2015 or 2016 unprotected 1st). This would be the all in for 1 stud. Would any team bite for this? Say we moved Burks, #10, GS pick and 2016 first unprotected (or Kanter in place of Burks). Would a team sitting at 2 or 3 be willing to give up Parker/Wiggins/Embiid for any of these? This would be my hope for the Jazz. Assets and good players will only take you so far and at some point you need to go all in, but can you get someone to bite?
4. Jazz stand pat at 10. Which players that are there do you like? WCS as a defensive C? Young, Hood, Grant, McDermott as the starting SF? Harris or Levine at SG? Vonleh at PF and put Favors at C? If Gordon drops to 10, are we the team that bites on his potential? Personally my hope would be for 1. Gordon 2. WCS 3. Hood 4. Young. Granted people will drop, others will rise, and others will opt to wait for 2015 if not guaranteed to be in the lottery.
Let's just hope the basketball Gods shine down on the Jazz for not tanking (if they keep winning) and they get to the top 3 and get their game changer (I'm all for Parker, do what it takes to get him).
wow wait until more of the season plays out before being chicken little.