What's new
By:

Following potential 2014 draftees

Another interview that makes me a little worried about Parker staying in school. He seems a little put off by the whole "one-and-done" thing. (starts at 1:26)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=glTdaZpAHMg
 
spycam1 said:
Another interview that makes me a little worried about Parker staying in school. He seems a little put off by the whole "one-and-done" thing. (starts at 1:26)
Click to expand...

Not shocking that there's some holier than thou sprinkled throughout.

;)
 
PKM said:
At that spot you go BPA. Period. Not debatable. Things are subject to change, of course, but most scouts believe Wiggins, Randle, and Parker are CLEARLY the top 3.
Click to expand...

Reminds me of the 2005 NBA draft... Bogut was the clear No. 1 (and the conventional wisdom would say - if in doubt - go BIG).

Doesn't mean Dwill/CP3 doesn't have just as much potential though...
 
Hotttnickkk said:
Reminds me of the 2005 NBA draft... Bogut was the clear No. 1 (and the conventional wisdom would say - if in doubt - go BIG).

Doesn't mean Dwill/CP3 doesn't have just as much potential though...
Click to expand...

I said go BPA.. if in doubt, I'll trust the franchise to either go big or go need. I am talking about if there's a clear BPA.
 
PKM said:
I said go BPA.. if in doubt, I'll trust the franchise to either go big or go need. I am talking about if there's a clear BPA.
Click to expand...

True.. but what I'm saying is even if Randle had a stunner of a season at UK and Andrew had an above average season, it's still hard to say who is BPA in say 5 years' time.

Randle could just be abusing "Kids" in college, while Andrew's skills set could be solid enough to thrive in the NBA (in the Westbrook/Harden trajectory of starting off slowly then shoots off).

All I'm saying is BPA isn't based on college stats alone, it's who that player will be at his peak.
 
Hotttnickkk said:
True.. but what I'm saying is even if Randle had a stunner of a season at UK and Andrew had an above average season, it's still hard to say who is BPA in say 5 years' time.

Randle could just be abusing "Kids" in college, while Andrew's skills set could be solid enough to thrive in the NBA (in the Westbrook/Harden trajectory of starting off slowly then shoots off).

All I'm saying is BPA isn't based on college stats alone, it's who that player will be at his peak.
Click to expand...

The sky is blue.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top