Park Bites
Well-Known Member
That was a strange statement. I prefer Parker, btw.
I was just saying with all this randle talk will be meaningless because the jazz are drafting Parker. he will be better at playing the 3/4 position.
That was a strange statement. I prefer Parker, btw.
I was just saying with all this randle talk will be meaningless because the jazz are drafting Parker. he will be better at playing the 3/4 position.
Randle is an average to slightly above average (at best) as a SF. He is above average to possibly elite as a PF. Huge mismatch at PF. I hate the idea of putting him at the SF slot.
Agree. If Randle was ok coming off the bench for a few years, Kanter, favors, Randle would be a lethal rotation and all three could still get 30+ mins, with a little Gobert thrown in when foul trouble or injuries occur. Randle would only play at SF if he insists on starting or if the Jazz have to counter with a big 3.
Article on McDermott's game translating, who is in play for the GS pick.
https://www.cbssports.com/collegeba...nk-doug-mcdermott-can-translate-to-next-level
Thought the plan was for the Jazz to draft Aaron Harrison with the Utah pick and then Andrew with the GS one. We'd then have those two for life.
Oops, faux pas on my part. But they're twins so I can get away with mixing them up.Whoever had that idea... it's pretty solid. (though Andrew with our's and Aaron with GSW... but I knew what you meant)
Whoever had that idea... it's pretty solid. (though Andrew with our's and Aaron with GSW... but I knew what you meant)