What's new

Following potential 2014 draftees

Wiggins in his own group, then Parker in his own group, then Randle in his own group, then Exum in his own group, then Embiid in his own group, then Smart in his own group.
 
Wiggins in his own group, then Parker in his own group, then Randle in his own group, then Exum in his own group, then Embiid in his own group, then Smart in his own group.

So many groups. Do you have thirty groups in the first round?
 
Tier 1 - Wiggins and Parker
Tier 2 - Randle, Exum, Smart and Embiid.
Tier 3 - everyone else. . .

Anything but a top two pick is a letdown. Anything outside of top 6 is sad in this draft. Good players, but missing out on elite #1 overall type guys.
 
Tier 1 - Wiggins and Parker
Tier 2 - Randle, Exum, Smart and Embiid.
Tier 3 - everyone else. . .

Anything but a top two pick is a letdown. Anything outside of top 6 is sad in this draft. Good players, but missing out on elite #1 overall type guys.
Our own draft position is making our fans sell the depth of this draft short. There's some REALLY good potential through about #40.

Having said that, I understand and agree.
 
I like Parker and wiggins at number 1, randle in his own second tier, and then exum and embiid. Followed by Gordon and smart. Those are the top three groups to me.

I agree with a slight difference. I don't think there is as big as gap between the tiers like in other drafts. The gap gets closer when a team considers their needs. My draft strategy is to take the best player available but there are cases that the difference is so small that I consider what a team needs.

Unless the Jazz move one of the bigs I see more of a need at SG/SF and for that reason I probably would take Exum over Randle.

I covet Embiid with the GS pick (yea I know I am dreaming that a miracle will happen) but I would be happy with WCS with the 10-12th pick. Again it also depends on if another shooter is available.
 
Back
Top