What's new

Following potential 2014 draftees

I think Randle can start for Utah at SF.











Cheers,
Hotttnickkk

You'd love Randle as a SF in our lineup. You know you do.

Burke
Hayward
Randle
Kanter (shooting 3's)
Favors

Easily the BIGGEST front court in the league.



This message was brought to you via a mobile device kkKKKkkkKKKKkkKKKKKkKKKkkkkkKKkkkkkkkkKKKkkkkkk
 
You'd love Randle as a SF in our lineup. You know you do.

Burke
Hayward
Randle
Kanter (shooting 3's)
Favors

Easily the BIGGEST front court in the league.



This message was brought to you via a mobile device kkKKKkkkKKKKkkKKKKKkKKKkkkkkKKkkkkkkkkKKKkkkkkk

:rolleyes: When you can't get Stan Van Gundy you simply copy the Pistons lineup and pretend to be coached by Stan...


Also I wanna make a prediction:
The best rookie from Kentucky next year will be Nerlens Noel. He'll be top10 in RPG/SPG and top5 in BPG next season. He'll be a mix of Joakim Noah with Dwight Howard's athleticism.
 
Zach LaVine is up to #16 (from 30) in the newest DX mock

that mock has the jazz selecting

(4) Dante Exum
(23) Kyle Anderson
(35) Isaiah Austin
 
Zach LaVine is up to #16 (from 30) in the newest DX mock

that mock has the jazz selecting

(4) Dante Exum
(23) Kyle Anderson
(35) Isaiah Austin

Wow.. what an interesting draft that would be. We could all argue about what position each one of those guys play.

We'll just be playing 3 PGs and 2 PFs lineup...


Burke (PG)
Exum (PG)
Anderson (PG)
Kanter (PF)
Favors (PF)


We might even start a new trend...
 
I think it's like this;

Exum - SG/PG
Anderson - PF/SF
Austin - PF/C

My concern in this draft is not fixing outside shooting.

We just don't have an elite shooter to clear the clogged lanes.

Exum and Burks on the perimeter certainly won't do it and I'm not sure having great 'slashers' helps that much if you've got 4-5 defenders packing it in.
 
I think it's like this;

Exum - SG/PG
Anderson - PF/SF
Austin - PF/C

My concern in this draft is not fixing outside shooting.

We just don't have an elite shooter to clear the clogged lanes.

Exum and Burks on the perimeter certainly won't do it and I'm not sure having great 'slashers' helps that much if you've got 4-5 defenders packing it in.

I agree. It also doesn't help our defense out much.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Trashtalk
 
No idea how true it is.. but I just heard that Philly is srsly considering Randle at #2.
Was told it's more of a positional need over bpa.. and that they have srs concerns over both embodied and Parker.

I only bring it up because, if true.. it only helps us. And it could be because, well.. it's Philly.
 
No idea how true it is.. but I just heard that Philly is srsly considering Randle at #2.
Was told it's more of a positional need over bpa.. and that they have srs concerns over both embodied and Parker.

I only bring it up because, if true.. it only helps us. And it could be because, well.. it's Philly.

Embodied.... i like.

I hope philly takes randle at 2..... or trades us the #2 to move back and take him with our pick
 
No idea how true it is.. but I just heard that Philly is srsly considering Randle at #2.
Was told it's more of a positional need over bpa.. and that they have srs concerns over both embodied and Parker.

I only bring it up because, if true.. it only helps us. And it could be because, well.. it's Philly.

I wouldn't be surprised in the least if this were true.



Nobody gave MCW the time of day last year (except me and a few others here) and Philly took him and ran with it. The same goes with Randle this year. Not saying Randle is the #2 player in the draft, but Randle to me has more fight than Embiid, Parker and Exum COMBINED.
 
Back
Top