What's new
By:

Following potential 2014 draftees

cowhide said:
Actually his stock is dropping, he didn't have a very good combine and measurements were bad. I like him but not as much as I did before because I thought he could play SF but his size seems to suggest he is more of a SG. I like Inglis and would take him at #35 and consider him at #23 depending on who else was available.
Click to expand...

possibly CJ Wilcox at #23 ?
 
Locke's assessment on Jabari - echoing what I detailed last year about my concern regarding Jabari's Tongan heritage and genes:


"How can he be over weight at 19 years old?"
 
seattlejazzfan said:
In regard to Parker, I watched every Duke game that was on TV this past season. At the beginning of the season, Parker was lights out from three and I was blown away. Here's a 6'8" frosh who can get up and down, who is not a great athlete, but a good athlete, can get his jump shot off at will and is mind-blowingly accurate. I couldn't believe what I was seeing. The problem is, I kept watching the games. I kept watching and Parker kept missing from the outside. After a while, a sample size 20-25 games against good competition starts to outweigh what I'd seen early in the year against mostly bad teams (he also shot well against Kansas in the 2nd or 3rd game of the season). Again, he might become a great shooter, but he will need to improve a ton.
Click to expand...

Could it be that he was asked to do more than he's used to and his conditioning failed him as the season came to an end?

His conditioning is becoming more and more of a concern for me.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Trashtalk
 
Hotttnickkk said:
Locke's assessment on Jabari - echoing what I detailed last year about my concern regarding Jabari's Tongan heritage and genes:


"How can he be over weight at 19 years old?"
Click to expand...

I guess Locke should look at the child obesity rate in the USA to find his answer. I don't think he is overweight but age has nothing to to with if a person is overweight.
 
I like TJ Warren too but I haven't see a lot of him so I don't know if he is a willing passer or if he can play defense, but at 23 I wouldn't hesitate to take him but I think he will be gone by 17 or 18 even earlier.
 
Im not one for excuses but when your usage rate is 36% like what TJ's was, while also being the teams leading rebounder, i think its fair to give him the benefit of the doubt on some defensive lapses

he was 10lbs heavier at NC State than at the combine too, it would seem hes changing his body a bit to fit a role at SF and his drills came out very good, near top tier guys in Lane Agility and Sprint.

his defense is kind of Jordan Adams-esque, not always in a stance, not the best lateral quickness, he gets beat a good bit off the dribble and caught reaching, BUT he does get plenty of steals and shows great anticipation, theres still some hope.
 
PointGod_AlecBurks said:
Im not one for excuses but when your usage rate is 36% like what TJ's was, while also being the teams leading rebounder, i think its fair to give him the benefit of the doubt on some defensive lapses

he was 10lbs heavier at NC State than at the combine too, it would seem hes changing his body a bit to fit a role at SF and his drills came out very good, near top tier guys in Lane Agility and Sprint.

his defense is kind of Jordan Adams-esque, not always in a stance, not the best lateral quickness, he gets beat a good bit off the dribble and caught reaching, BUT he does get plenty of steals and shows great anticipation, theres still some hope.
Click to expand...

Of you could choose between Warren and McDaniels, who are you taking?

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Trashtalk
 
orangello said:
Of you could choose between Warren and McDaniels, who are you taking?

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Trashtalk
Click to expand...

its not close IMO. Warren is fringe lottery grade. I'm a McDaniels fan and had a smile ear to ear watching him vs Duke. I think hes more of a project at this point, a great defender, i love his FT shooting and he has a bunch of different skills but i think at the end of the day hes a mixed bag on offense... if only his handle was better

that grantland article where the scout says "Wiggins just dosent have that '**** you' to his game", im sure i saw a bit of that from Warren this year, especially in the battles with Syracuse he crushed CJ Fairs chances of getting drafted, IMO, and showed plenty of "**** you" in the back to back 41 and 42 point games, he was legit NBA jam on fire vs. pitt drilling heatchecks from nba 3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GqhwV-wzLU

dat floater doe...
 
PointGod_AlecBurks said:
its not close IMO. Warren is fringe lottery grade. I'm a McDaniels fan and had a smile ear to ear watching him vs Duke. I think hes more of a project at this point, a great defender, i love his FT shooting and he has a bunch of different skills but i think at the end of the day hes a mixed bag on offense... if only his handle was better

that grantland article where the scout says "Wiggins just dosent have that '**** you' to his game", im sure i saw a bit of that from Warren this year, especially in the battles with Syracuse he crushed CJ Fairs chances of getting drafted, IMO and showed plenty of "**** you" in the back to back 41 and 42 point games, he was legit NBA jam on fire vs. pitt drilling heatchecks from nba 3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GqhwV-wzLU

dat floater doe...
Click to expand...


Maybe that's where we differ.

I'm more concerned about the Jazz defense, you seemed to be concerned about the offense.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Trashtalk
 
Part of Parker's problem is that he was playing the 5 position quite a bit. In addition, Duke didn't offer much help defensively. He was definitely over-used.

Does he have to improve his shot? Absolutely. I never thought he was that good from 3 to begin with. Saying that Evan Turner is a better 3-PT shooter is absurd though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top