What's new
By:

Following potential 2017 draftees...

I am sure Pgab has brought him up before because he mentions 100 different players but why aren't we talking about Peter jok

38% from 3 on 7 attempts per game

Almost 6 free throws per at 91% clip

20 points a game and a senior

6-6 is a good measurement for an NBA 2 guard

I don't understand why he isn't getting talked about more?

Sent from my Z981 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Crocodile Dante said:
I am sure Pgab has brought him up before because he mentions 100 different players but why aren't we talking about Peter jok

38% from 3 on 7 attempts per game

Almost 6 free throws per at 91% clip

20 points a game and a senior

6-6 is a good measurement for an NBA 2 guard

I don't understand why he isn't getting talked about more?

Sent from my Z981 using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...

He should have gone to Portsmouth
 
What the jazz needs out of this upcoming draft is simple: athleticism and hustle. Favors can't jump due to injuries. Lyles, Ingles, Joe, Mack and Diaw all play grandpa style of basketball with no leap in their game. It'd time to bring back Trevor Booker level of energy and intensity back to Quin's defense philosophy.
 
jom2003 said:
What the jazz needs out of this upcoming draft is simple: athleticism and hustle. Favors can't jump due to injuries. Lyles, Ingles, Joe, Mack and Diaw all play grandpa style of basketball with no leap in their game. It'd time to bring back Trevor Booker level of energy and intensity back to Quin's defense philosophy.
Click to expand...

I agree. Let's go with upside this time. We have enough 'solid role players' type already.


Also picking late in the draft it's time to 'go big or go home'. We need to make the Spurs type picks now.
 
I wonder if with the 7th pick the Knicks will take a long hard look at LAURI MARKKANEN?


Pairing him with Porzingis could really be fun to watch. The only problem is can Porzingis play Center full time?
 
ONE LOVE said:
I agree. Let's go with upside this time. We have enough 'solid role players' type already.


Also picking late in the draft it's time to 'go big or go home'. We need to make the Spurs type picks now.
Click to expand...

If Harry Giles is there at 24 he would be that type of pick. I have been watching a lot of duke games and he is still tentative off that left leg.

Give him a year behind favs to heal, learn and strengthen and he could be the steal of this draft but much as he could be the steal he could be the bust of the draft although drafting at 24 wouldnt be that much of a bust just his potential.

The problem with saying s spurs draft doesnt make sense. They are known for draft solid players late in the draft. Then adding free agents around them. So late in the first the Jazz need to say Gobert and Hayward are the franchise who can we put around them to make them better.

Josh Hart is completely a spurs type of pick. Doesnt do anyting great but is good at most things. He is a warrior and a competitor.

Bam Adebayo is a high ceiling pick. My concern with him is he doesnt have any game away from the basket and that isnt a great fit next to gobert

Justin Jackson is also a spurs type of fit because he is perfect for the system that the Jazz run. His mid range game is perfect and his 3 pt shooting is decent.

Rodions Kurucs is a solid pick that has the potential to be very good although he could be redundant to Hayward and not a compliment to hayward unless he can play the 2.

I like swanigan as a stretch 4 who can create space for gobert but I question his fit in utah considering his history and family here.

If the Jazz are completely sold on a player like Markanen a move up to get him would be amazing next to gobert. Gobert fixes a lot of his problems. If he slides at all on draft night he would be a great target. The question then becomes what do you give up to get him. Hood?
 
Crocodile Dante said:
If Harry Giles is there at 24 he would be that type of pick. I have been watching a lot of duke games and he is still tentative off that left leg.

Give him a year behind favs to heal, learn and strengthen and he could be the steal of this draft but much as he could be the steal he could be the bust of the draft although drafting at 24 wouldnt be that much of a bust just his potential.

The problem with saying s spurs draft doesnt make sense. They are known for draft solid players late in the draft. Then adding free agents around them. So late in the first the Jazz need to say Gobert and Hayward are the franchise who can we put around them to make them better.

Josh Hart is completely a spurs type of pick. Doesnt do anyting great but is good at most things. He is a warrior and a competitor.

Bam Adebayo is a high ceiling pick. My concern with him is he doesnt have any game away from the basket and that isnt a great fit next to gobert

Justin Jackson is also a spurs type of fit because he is perfect for the system that the Jazz run. His mid range game is perfect and his 3 pt shooting is decent.

Rodions Kurucs is a solid pick that has the potential to be very good although he could be redundant to Hayward and not a compliment to hayward unless he can play the 2.

I like swanigan as a stretch 4 who can create space for gobert but I question his fit in utah considering his history and family here.

If the Jazz are completely sold on a player like Markanen a move up to get him would be amazing next to gobert. Gobert fixes a lot of his problems. If he slides at all on draft night he would be a great target. The question then becomes what do you give up to get him. Hood?
Click to expand...

Can Giles shoot it? That's pretty important nowadays as a PF to be able to stroke it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top