He said recent memory though, and some of us barely remember our names, let alone what happened 2 or 3 years ago.
Well, it was also a trade after FA, not on/before draft day.
He said recent memory though, and some of us barely remember our names, let alone what happened 2 or 3 years ago.
Yep, that's another thing - they are reportedly targeting Josh Jackson at 3. That's Brown, Crowder and Jackson at the 3. I'm not sure it means much, because some of those might be traded, but...
Well, it was also a trade after FA, not on/before draft day.
I take back what I said about it being good news.
Now there is talk that Ainge is trying to acquire more picks and free up cap space to go after Butler and Hayward. If that's the case, I hope he ****s it up by getting too greedy.
So if the rumors are true, Boston trades #1 to Philly for #3 and a future first. Boston then trades two future firsts and a player for Butler. Boston loses out on Fultz, but drafts Jackson/Tatum, trades for Butler and clears space for Hayward.
Result: IT / Butler / Hayward / Crowder / Horford with Tatum off the bench. They still can't rebound though.
Sounds like the trade is pretty much a done deal. However, if I'm Chicago, I think I would have insisted on Fultz. You never know about those future picks.
That's the thing, If Boston gets Butler, why the Hell do they need Hayward? They need a center, and they would be rolling. You could get Dewayne Dedmon and Aron Baynes to back him up for less than what you will be paying Hayward. Now Boston is a legit defensive force while being able to cover for IT.
Why do you need to sign Hayward when you can get Dedmon and Baynes? Is that a serious comment?