In any event, I'm merely defending Fox News from the claim that they didn't bother to credit the onion with the story, because we have evidence that they did in the form of the cache.
...I'm not certain the assertion that they didn't credit the onion is true.
This is the image shown on the link:
![]()
This is the Google Cache page: https://webcache.googleusercontent....obama-sends-nation-rambling-75000-word-e-mail
The Google Cache page includes a link to "read the full story at theonion.com." That portion of the image is not displayed in the original link.
However, the comments displayed indicate that the readers of the page had no idea.
Personally I take "read the full story at theonion.com" as evidence that the person knew. I mean, come on, it's the onion. Then again, it's obvious the implications of that notice escaped many readers.
In any event, I'm merely defending Fox News from the claim that they didn't bother to credit the onion with the story, because we have evidence that they did in the form of the cache.

Speaking of which,
![]()
?
Ya, I don't know what I was thinking. Your nose isn't caked with dried up **** from having it crammed up the Right's butt hole or anything -- I must have just imagined your blind loyalty and faith.
My bad.