Crawlnstall
Well-Known Member
Even though we lost I was happy to see how kanter played. We didn't lose because of him
So you think we win a bunch of games if we give Burke and burks minutes to hood, ingles, exum, and clarke?
lol we truly are tanking. this is perhaps Burke's first game where he not only scored a lot efficiently, but also had a positive +/-. So Quin decides to play Exum more as a result. I mean I'm happy Exum got to play more today, but I still find it funny that it happened to be this game as opposed to many other prior games where it would have made more sense.
lol we truly are tanking. this is perhaps Burke's first game where he not only scored a lot efficiently, but also had a positive +/-. So Quin decides to play Exum more as a result. I mean I'm happy Exum got to play more today, but I still find it funny that it happened to be this game as opposed to many other prior games where it would have made more sense.
Kanter's making a real effort on defense. He's getting into a stance and keeping pace, even out on the perimeter. His movement is actually pretty good.
There may be some truth to this. Gobert was a big part of the Jazz's success in the 3rd quarter, but he didn't get many minutes in the 4th, while Booker and Evans played.
Gobert and Kanter was our best front-court combo tonight, but they didn't play much together in the 4th.
Snyder was making offensive/defensive substitutions in the 4th with Gobert/Booker. The paint is just so clogged on our drives by our wing players when Gobert is in the game.