Is this the type of game that I should hope the Jazz would lose just to get some changes taking place?
Locke mentioned this morning that tonight and @Washington are both must wins and if not there could be a shake up.
So I ask again, do I hope for a shake up by hoping for a loss?
Is this the type of game that I should hope the Jazz would lose just to get some changes taking place?
Locke mentioned this morning that tonight and @Washington are both must wins and if not there could be a shake up.
So I ask again, do I hope for a shake up by hoping for a loss?
"Shake up" in Jazz parlance means Foye starting at the 2.
"shake up"------ thats hilarious. Whats Ty gonna do? Play Al all 48 minutes and then bow down to him and kiss his fat feet when his grace leaves the court?
Think positive Grandma!
I hope that is not what "shake up" means.
I ideally the Jazz would lose big with Favors and Kanter only playing 15 minutes each but have a +5-10 for their time on the floor. Then it would be obvious, right?
Just did the Jazz straight up in three different parlays.
Patrick Kinahan @PKKinahan
The 7-footer is shooting easily over the 6-7 guy. Is there somebody taller to guard him? #UTAatTOR
Obvious? To us, yes, but the Jazz FO hasn't fired a coach since Layden replaced Nissalke in '81.
I know there is a lot of hate of PK around here but this is great: