What's new

Game Thread: Game #78: Bland Antonio Spurts, Tuesday April 5th (7:00 PM MST)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 848
  • Start date Start date
Chris johnson last night: 0-2, zero points, zero rebounds, zero assists, zero steals, zero blocks. At least he had zero turnovers. (in his defense he only played 2 minutes according to the box score.)

The Spurs actually got a fast break off one of his 3-pt misses - ugh.

While I was naturally elated that The Jazz made a run in the 4th - the reality is it did nothing more than put a wet Band-Aid on the bigger problem regarding Utah's lack of depth. Let's face it - that was a 1 in 20 game shooting performance by Ingles. Without it this game never gets close. You obviously can't depend on that every game against the top shelf teams.

While I don't have delusions of grandeur I'd at least want to see Utah give their first round opponent run for their money - kind of like OKC did a few years back against LAL right before they became a top shelf team.
 
The Spurs actually got a fast break off one of his 3-pt misses - ugh.

While I was naturally elated that The Jazz made a run in the 4th - the reality is it did nothing more than put a wet Band-Aid on the bigger problem regarding Utah's lack of depth. Let's face it - that was a 1 in 20 game shooting performance by Ingles. Without it this game never gets close. You obviously can't depend on that every game against the top shelf teams.

While I don't have delusions of grandeur I'd at least want to see Utah give their first round opponent run for their money - kind of like OKC did a few years back against LAL right before they became a top shelf team.

DL said something recently, unprompted during the SLC Stars press conference, that he would self-evaluate his decision to trust the bench as is.
 
And lmfao, Spurs had a bad game and Jazz had a good game, and you still lost and a lot of posters are saying this team will be better than Spurs in 2 years time. Holy ****.
 
You've just lost a lot of credibility. I love DFav. But Kawhi is top 5-10ish in league. Dfavis top 20-30ish.

I read it as not comparing him to Kawhi - he was comparing him to LaMarcus Aldridge.

Which by the way I agree - given the choice between Favors and LMA I think most folks would pick Favors.
 
You've just lost a lot of credibility. I love DFav. But Kawhi is top 5-10ish in league. Dfavis top 20-30ish.

Yeah a lot of these posters are absolutely delusional. I don't even have any words for this level of stupidity tbh.
He was comparing favors to aldridge, not Leonard, silly guys.
 
IDK why you went with a gallon of milk since it's bigger and heavier than a basketball.

my two year old son can hold a gallon of milk, yet not catch, or hold a basketball.

a gallon of milk has a 2 inch diameter handle, thus, i can hold a gallon of milk with one hand much better than hold a basketball with one hand.
 
I read it as not comparing him to Kawhi - he was comparing him to LaMarcus Aldridge.

Which by the way I agree - given the choice between Favors and LMA I think most folks would pick Favors.
Depends if you mean for the moment or long term. For the next 2 -3 years I think Aldridge is a pretty easy pick between the too. If you are picking someone to build on for the future, well yea its Favors, he is much much younger.

If your a win now team though Aldridge is a no brainer between the two.
 
my two year old son can hold a gallon of milk, yet not catch, or hold a basketball.

a gallon of milk has a 2 inch diameter handle, thus, i can hold a gallon of milk with one hand much better than hold a basketball with one hand.

Why are you throwing a gallon of milk at your 2 year old?
 
Back
Top