FalseFlagg K
Well-Known Member
i'm hoping this was Quin's feel out the opposition game and the next game is where he really lays out what he wants to do and we put out best foot forward. This was a real mixed bag
No I have no alias' other than Treyd Burke which got banned right away. I don't need an alias, I can call spades spades with spectacular accuracy. Nothing to hide.
the witchhunt for me is over.. I won.. No one on this forum ever stood a chance. U don't know the furious human being typing this ****, if you did, you'd never doubt me anyways.
I just prefer to lose with exum rather than mack is all.Everyone complaining about mack really just needs to shut up. We all know we're going to lose 4-0 or 4-1. It isn't Mack's fault.
I just prefer to lose with exum rather than mack is all.
I agreeI wonder if going big would give us a shot? Gobert and Favors/Bolomboy at the 5 and 4? It might help us to control the paint and boards. It could also screw up our offensive spacing. But I don't think we can stand pat at the 4. We either need to go big and pound the hell out of them inside like what we did in 2007 or combat their stretch 4 with our Lyles (he probably needs some burn this series).
Also, we need to give all of mack's mins to Exum.