What's new
By:

Game Thread:The Utah Tankers at Tanking Vs. The Indiana Blue Steel Pacers!! 4:00PM

And with respect to Corbin... I flip flop back and forth about the level of tank that he's a part of. It seems the games against good teams, the Jazz play much better, the rotations are more relevant (but usually sticking to script, ala JSlo) This game, the Miami game at home, the OKC game, one (at least) of the SAS games, showed me that if the Jazz want to, they can compete quite well with the best teams in the league. The crappy games happen because its just a reality that the Jazz are not that good yet, but also, they are aided by experiments/practice efforts (Hayward given the green light to shoot every time he touches it regardless, Kanter to do the same, etc) But most of that stuff and the various other weird adjustments come against crappier teams.
.
Also, this is consistent with the JSlo model which is to give guys reps on key elements of their game early in the season, work with consistent substitution patterns, (where's InGameStrategy to debate this can of worms) work the offense and defensive plans regardless of who's hot, etc. Corbin is using this model - but it appears he's experimented more based on the level of the competitor... "soft tank" I guess...

Any thoughts on that? (not that soft tanking is a bad idea, but rather if you think that is a conscious plan)
 
Glad to see Rush is completely out of the rotation for now.

In a 3 person wing rotation, Burks will see at least 30 mpg.
 
Harcher said:
But more importantly, the Jazz looked good on offense. This is baaaaad news for the Corbin haterzz. The Pacers are the best defensive team in NBA (one of anyway) and the Jazz were running a legit offense and getting good looks because of it. Now it is also true that the Jazz made mistakes - but so did the team they are playing, who happens to be the best in the NBA at the moment.
Click to expand...

Offense hasn't been the main problem with Corbin. It's always been more defense, and our lack of it.
 
Favors has really established himself in the league this year. Nice steady performance defensively and decent offense some nights.
 
Revolution 9 said:
Offense hasn't been the main problem with Corbin. It's always been more defense, and our lack of it.
Click to expand...

Regardless of it being the main problem or not, the offense had been painful to watch early on. Lately, and especially, this game, it was fun to watch and was effective against a good defensive team.
 
If we had limited our TO's or if Derrick would have hit his FT's, this game would have been ours easily.
 
Harcher said:
Regardless of it being the main problem or not, the offense had been painful to watch early on. Lately, and especially, this game, it was fun to watch and was effective against a good defensive team.
Click to expand...

Agreed. It has improved, but how much credit do we give Corbin? Of course it was going to look awful early on without a PG, and a lot of young guys in new roles though.

Not saying Corbin shouldn't get credit, but it's debatable.
 
Anybody see Stephenson just push Evans out of the way on his way to an easy layup? How pathetic is it that a PF can't stand up to a SG?
 
gregbroncs said:
Anybody see Stephenson just push Evans out of the way on his way to an easy layup? How pathetic is it that a PF can't stand up to a SG?
Click to expand...

Stephenson is one of the stronger and more aggressive SG's in the league. Could very well be the strongest.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top