seattlejazzfan
Well-Known Member
You do of course realize that Kanter and Favors can be on the court at the same time, right?
And there is this.
You do of course realize that Kanter and Favors can be on the court at the same time, right?
You do of course realize that Kanter and Favors can be on the court at the same time, right?
Who was playing better through 3 quarters Monday? Kanter or Favors?
Bad arguement when there are three bigs. Which 2 were playing the best, and where best for the close end game. Favors, Kanter and/or Sap?
I didn't see a whole lot of problems tonight that can't be fixed. Earl's 7 minutes might have killed that game for us but otherwise a lot of things were encouraging about that game.
I didn't see a whole lot of problems tonight that can't be fixed. Earl's 7 minutes might have killed that game for us but otherwise a lot of things were encouraging about that game.
Not an argument, just a question. I understand why you chose to dodge the question. No worries. What we do know for certain is that Favors is one of the two who were playing the best. Yet he is the guy who sat the bench for 17 minutes. You gotta love it baby!
i would not call it trying it something new.This. Watson should not see the floor. Why is Marvin playing the 4? If you are that far downt he 4 then try Evans. But Kudos to Ty for trying something new I guess. I would have given more time to Kanter andCarroll at the expense of Marvin.
Also Foye should not be guarding the best wing player in crunch time. Carroll, Hayward and Burks are better for that. Also once again, I think it should have been Favors and Kanter closing out the game.
I am not dodging the question.