What's new
By:

Gay Marriage is GO...

Scat said:
This may be great for your sexual desires but what are you going to do with the remaining 23 hours and 55 minutes?
Click to expand...

Pssh. You obviously have not been married for 20+ years. There is way more than that in play.
 
In fact, I have been married for 25+ years and I cannot fathom having two additional wives. I love my wife to death but one is enough, thank you!
 
Scat said:
In fact, I have been married for 25+ years and I cannot fathom having two additional wives. I love my wife to death but one is enough, thank you!
Click to expand...

To each their own. But if after 25 years you cannot see where someone might find this interesting in more ways than just sex I think either you get the most and best sex of anyone ever, or you have never really challenged your own assumptions.

Actually my wife and I have discussed this and it was her who brought the subject up that she would be open to, and even encourage, this kind of arrangement for many different reasons, including companionship, sharing of duties in running a family, extra income, downtime, etc.
 
Hate Wins: Oregon State Issues Gag Order Against Opposing Gay Marriage

In a sign of the overt fascism and religious persecution to come in the wake of a Left emboldened by the Supreme Court’s recent gay marriage ruling, a judge in Oregon has issued a gag order denying two Christian bakery owners from speaking out against same sex marriage.

“The Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor and Industries hereby orders [Aaron and Melissa Klein] to cease and desist from publishing, circulating, issuing or displaying, or causing to be published … any communication to the effect that any of the accommodations … will be refused, withheld from or denied to, or that any discrimination be made against, any person on account of their sexual orientation,” [Administrative Law Judge Alan] Avakian wrote.

The gag order is meant to stop Aaron and Melissa Klein from publicly speaking out about their desire to not bake cakes for same sex weddings. The State’s order came after the Kleins were interviewed by the Family Research Council’s Tony Perkins, and after the State fined the Kleins $135,000 for “emotional damages” incurred by a lesbian couple after the Kleins refused to bake their wedding cake.

That this kind of fascist oppression was always the endgame in the Left’s push for same sex marriage, was apparent to anyone familiar with the Left’s tactics.

The push for same sex marriage was always nothing more the Left’s sheep’s clothing in a crusade to destroy Christians and the Christian Church.

By adhering to the word of God, the Left will label Christians bigots and haters, and use the power of boycotts and the State to punish and silence us.

Now that gay marriage is the law of the land, the gay-pride flag will become the fascist banner under which any Church that doesn’t perform same sex marriages will be dismantled piece-by-piece. The tools used by the Gaystapo will include coordinated hate campaigns in the media, as well as political campaigns aimed at removing the Church’s tax exempt status.

Christians and conservatives who never believed this could happen are part of the problem.

1995: We don’t want marriage, just civil unions.

2005: Our marriage won’t affect your rights.

2014: Bake me a cake, or else.

2015: Your opinion against same sex marriage is illegal.

Moreover, it is not discrimination to not want to be forced by the State to participate in and profit from what Christians correctly see as the sacramentalization of sin, which is what a same sex marriage ceremony is. Christians believe our very soul is at stake.

Besides the State, the true bigoted oppressor here is the fascist lesbian couple demanding Christians be silenced by the State, but only after demanding the State force a small business owner into celebrating their marriage.

Oh, and happy Independence Day.
Click to expand...
 
DutchJazzer said:
i know about that code. but seems like they wouldnt accept same rights with another name of mariage ;)
Click to expand...


Yeah, for some reason there's just a certain amount of resistance to the idea of "separate but equal," probably because it doesn't typically end up being all that equal.
 
LogGrad98 said:
To each their own. But if after 25 years you cannot see where someone might find this interesting in more ways than just sex I think either you get the most and best sex of anyone ever, or you have never really challenged your own assumptions.

Actually my wife and I have discussed this and it was her who brought the subject up that she would be open to, and even encourage, this kind of arrangement for many different reasons, including companionship, sharing of duties in running a family, extra income, downtime, etc.
Click to expand...
There would definitely be some advantages to it. Maybe my additional wife would know how to clean a house?
 
Right after the US won the World Cup one of the players ran to the stands and starting kissing and hugging her partner. There was about 4 seconds of silence as if there was an indecision as to whether or not to acknowledge the obvious. Now if she ran to her husband......

Anyway we still got a ways to go.
 
candrew said:
Right after the US won the World Cup one of the players ran to the stands and starting kissing and hugging her partner. There was about 4 seconds of silence as if there was an indecision as to whether or not to acknowledge the obvious. Now if she ran to her husband......

Anyway we still got a ways to go.
Click to expand...

agree on still having a ways to go...
It didn't seem the hesitation was anywhere near 4 seconds, and it seemed to occur more in deciding what term to use to refer to her girlfriend more so than in acknowledging that she was sharing her joy with someone special to her

bigb said:
There would definitely be some advantages to it. Maybe my additional wife would know how to clean a house?
Click to expand...

and maybe my additional husband would know how to take out the garbage!

So are any of you seriously advocating that polygamy be elevated to a legal status similar to a marriage between two people? Because I'm wondering what parameters you would consider reasonable.

For instance, if two people were married, and one of them wanted to add a third person to the marriage, would the other partner have to agree? And would all three be married to each of the others?

It doesn't seem that you should allow one of the spouses to have a second spouse if it would create an unequal relationship between the three spouses. And, if it is a situation with multiple women, do all the women in the marriage have full custody rights to a child that any of them gave birth to?

Or in the case of multiple men, is it presumed that both are the father of any children born during the marriage, again with full custody rights regardless of what any paternity test might show?

Just curious how you geniuses would work out all these issues.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top