What's new
By:

George Hill coming to Utah

dalamon said:
Anyone wanna join me in laughing at PG_AB's New York Knicks?!!


Laughed for 10 mins straight when I heard news of the trade. Garbage franchise.
Click to expand...

I'm not a Knicks fan but they have 2 championships in '70 and '73. The Jazz are just a 40 something year old expansion franchise in comparison. Their most well known for losing in the most iconic moments in NBA history. Their legendary player Karl Malone is a total scumbag who fathered children he denied exist too. Thats who you build statues for.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYVjltXc5F8 This is greater than any performance in Jazz history. Easily.


Knicks also a $3+ billion franchise.


I'ma take my talents to root for some other expansion team. Utah is just spinning their tires. They've chose to fight against an opponent that can TOY with them, rather than taking a long-term outlook.


Who's laughing now?!
 
PG_AB said:
(In response to my saying the trade was too risky)
Click to expand...
Are you trying to claim Hill was a bad trade? He was a great fit and a great leader that helped this team improve greatly. Regardless of if he re-signs he was a solid trade looking back. Another miss from you. Although you seem to think it's win a championship or bust with no middle ground and no improving. So that's a problem work your logic in general.
 
Dr. Jones said:
Again, I haven't read the thread, but I assume I feel the same as the majority.
Love the player/fit, a lot, but feels icky that he's got one year left and we could possible be missing on a good player tied up many years.

I like win now, but not sure how much we can win next year that's really meaningful.

One thing is certain, though... We know less than 10% of the behind-the-scenes plotting and scheming.
Click to expand...

This guy gets it. You're not all bamboozled. just a vast majority.
 
[MENTION=2408]PG_AB[/MENTION], stop spamming the thread.

Also I am glad that you agree with Dr. Jones that you know less than 10% of what is going on.
 
Ron Mexico said:
Are you trying to claim Hill was a bad trade? He was a great fit and a great leader that helped this team improve greatly. Regardless of if he re-signs he was a solid trade looking back. Another miss from you. Although you seem to think it's win a championship or bust with no middle ground and no improving. So that's a problem work your logic in general.
Click to expand...

All for naught, SENSATIONALIZE IT ALL YOU WANT. The proof is in the pudding. We haven't even gotten to the part where he tries to price gouge them yet, and as a franchise, they asked for that... He provided great moments against bottom-feeders like the Knicks and Lakers.

It was a terrible trade. Time will only further prove that to be true.


Was the trading up for Trey Burke a terrible trade too? or u in full denial/territorial mode?

I called the Trey Burke pick out, in great detail, MONTHS in advance too.. While lames like [MENTION=848]dalamon[/MENTION] called him the savior and god and grotesque things of that nature. I said this guy has a step-back J and not much else.

I even said I'd stop rooting for the team if they picked burke, and I planned to but I said since they drafted Rudy i'm gonna stick around. None of this is sensationalized either..

There were people calling for Burke from the 1st page of the 2013 draftees thread --- I thoroughly debunked many of his 'strengths and weaknesses' beyond a shadow of a doubt.. and then what happened? Burke proved pretty much every word of it true.


How many ****ing idiots went out of their way to try and trash DENNIS SCHRODER, who I said is definitely better, to make their point about Burke??? ha? DENIAL is heavy here. You lose a battle like that, you retreat to higher ground and try again. I'll ****ing beat you every which way tho. My point has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt -- DENY DENY DENY tho. It's a terrific compliment, thank you all. You proved my point, not me.
 
Will you bump the thread when we re-sign Hill and win 60 games next year?
 
PG_AB said:
All for naught. He provided great moments against bottom-feeders like the Knicks and Lakers.

It was a terrible trade. Time will only further prove that to be true.


Was the trading up for Trey Burke a terrible trade too? or u in full denial/territorial mode?

I called the Trey Burke pick out, in great detail, MONTHS in advance too.. While lames like [MENTION=848]dalamon[/MENTION] called him the savior and god and grotesque things of that nature.

There were people calling for Burke from the 1st page of the 2013 draftees thread --- I thoroughly debunked many of his 'strengths and weaknesses' beyond a shadow of a doubt.. and then what happened? Burke proved pretty much every word of it true.


How many ****ing idiots went out of their way to try and trash DENNIS SCHRODER, who I said is definitely better, to make their point about Burke??? ha? DENIAL is heavy here. You lose a battle like that, you retreat to higher ground and try again. I'll ****ing beat you every which way tho. My point has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt -- DENY DENY DENY tho. It's a terrific compliment, thank you all. You proved my point, not me.
Click to expand...

Schroeder sucks... hill helped us win game 7 against the clips... who'd be a 1 or 2 seed in the east. Bottom feeders... dear God man you are just the worst.
 
PG_AB said:
All for naught, SENSATIONALIZE IT ALL YOU WANT. The proof is in the pudding. We haven't even gotten to the part where he tries to price gouge them yet, and as a franchise, they asked for that... He provided great moments against bottom-feeders like the Knicks and Lakers.

It was a terrible trade. Time will only further prove that to be true.


Was the trading up for Trey Burke a terrible trade too? or u in full denial/territorial mode?

I called the Trey Burke pick out, in great detail, MONTHS in advance too.. While lames like [MENTION=848]dalamon[/MENTION] called him the savior and god and grotesque things of that nature. I said this guy has a step-back J and not much else.

I even said I'd stop rooting for the team if they picked burke, and I planned to but I said since they drafted Rudy i'm gonna stick around. None of this is sensationalized either..

There were people calling for Burke from the 1st page of the 2013 draftees thread --- I thoroughly debunked many of his 'strengths and weaknesses' beyond a shadow of a doubt.. and then what happened? Burke proved pretty much every word of it true.


How many ****ing idiots went out of their way to try and trash DENNIS SCHRODER, who I said is definitely better, to make their point about Burke??? ha? DENIAL is heavy here. You lose a battle like that, you retreat to higher ground and try again. I'll ****ing beat you every which way tho. My point has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt -- DENY DENY DENY tho. It's a terrific compliment, thank you all. You proved my point, not me.
Click to expand...
The proof is in the pudding already. Hill was a huge help this season. If Hayward stay he is a huge reason why. He is a huge reason why we won so much this season and the success we had in the playoffs.

Burke's is a different trade. I know you like to switch arguments half way through and make up silly arguments for people to make yourself sound better but it really makes you look silly. I wasn't a fan of the Burke's trade or Burke. So stop this terrible argument style. It might work well with kids you are around but it makes most people lose respect for you.

Sent from my Nexus 5X using JazzFanz mobile app
 
I tend to agree with PG_AB. Wasn't a huge fan of the trade, felt like they were doing what they promised not to do and started skipping steps. Not sure it hurts the franchise too much though unless there was someone available last year at 12 that we're going to wish we had. I don't see that at this point.
 
It was a bad trade because Hill was hurt so much.

If you get Teague instead of Hill, you might end up third in the west, play in the conference finals, you already have Teague extended and Hayward is talking about how he signs at midnight so we can add another piece or two.

Compare that to where we are now: if Hayward leaves, we are back to tanking. If Hayward stays, are you more likely to re-sign an old PG that has been hurt a lot? Probably.

When you realize you could have had Teague instead, it was a bad trade.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top