What's new

George Hill coming to Utah

Although #12 for a 30 year old PG with 1 year left on his contract may be an overpayment, I understand & like this move. For awhile now, I've felt that we needed to either add veterans & attempt to win now or trade our players nearing the end of their contracts (Hayward/Favors) & continue to rebuild.

George Hill absolutely makes sense for this team (more so than Teague IMO). He's a good defender & 3pt shooter capable of playing either guard position. Although #12 is a bit much to give up for him, realistically we weren't going to get better production from a rookie in what will undoubtedly be a defining season for this franchise.

Adding Hill not only gives us a veteran at a position of need, but it takes a lot of pressure off of Dante Exum as well. This trade also gives us a very solid rotation with Hill/Exum, Hayward/Hood/Burks, & Favors/Gobert/Lyles (not to mention Mack, Neto, Ingles, Whithey, etc) That is a deep, flexible, defensive oriented team that compliments eachother well. I expect us to compete for the 4/5 seed & have a very good chance at advancing to the 2nd round (assuming we stay moderately healthy *knock on wood*).

While it's always fun to dream on the potential of a lottery pick, veteran leadership, defensive ability, & 3 pt shooting out of the PG position is much more valuable to our current roster than additional potential would have been (which we have plenty of). We had come to a fork in the road & it was time for management to pick a direction, I'm just glad they made a definitive decision. Welcome to Utah, George Hill. Go Jazz!
Great post.
I feel the same way
 
Just spoke to G Hill's agent: Although on one year deal, the hope is Hill will be in Utah long term
— Tony Jones (@Tjonessltrib) June 22, 2016
Hill's agent said they would've looked at Utah next season in free agency regardless. He loves Snyder, has close relationship with Hayward
— Tony Jones (@Tjonessltrib) June 22, 2016
Agent said Hill wants to go "where he is loved"....didn't always feel appreciated in Indiana with the Pacers
— Tony Jones (@Tjonessltrib) June 22, 2016
...

This is enough of good omen coming out of the Hill camp for me to get officially excited about this trade. I didn't know there was a relationship with Hayward or a fondness for Snyder. Great to hear.

Also, I've always thought Hill's game would age well. He's got 4 or 5 productive years left. 4 or 5 years of Hill would be much better than we were likely to get out of the 12th pick in this draft.
 
I know a lot of people don't do it on here but it's called agreeing haha.
Lol. Ya it's been so long since someone agreed with me I forgot what is like.
 
Why are the Jazz telegraphing this? That almost guarantees they are going to have to eat his contract. Why not say something like "We think Trey is a valuable part of our team, has a great upside and is in our long-term plans."?

Well, I can think of two reasons:

1. They tried it, but everyone assumed they were talking about Lyles, or
2. They broke into hysterical laughter every time they tried to spit it out.
 
I don't see it that way at all. Hill's agent said he wants to re-sign in Utah if possible. So Lindsey has perfect insurance: if Dante blows up, then he's our guy. If he doesn't, then re-sign Hill next summer. Win-win.

Hill is 30. He isn't a long term solution. He is a 1-2 year stop gap. A really good one, but a short one.
 
I'm having difficulty understanding why we didn't just get Teague and leave Indiana out of this. Teague is two years younger and the better player.
A few things. The Jazz view Exum as the man at pg is their high priced high draft pick.

Also to resign Teague we are looking at 14-17 million a year. Sounds like Hill wants to be here long term. IMO I don't think DL gives up the pick for a one year rental. Signing Teague would hurt the long term potential of Exum. I don't think Teague would want to sign a shorter deal.

Last. U can play Exum and Hill together giving Exum more minutes.
Like sir said, why did we get Hill and not Teague.
Look at my post above.


I like Hill more than Teague, but the cost was too high if all we get back is Hill for #12
Lol. This from a guy that wanted to trade Hayward for the 3rd pick. Lol
I'm with Cy, 100%.
Get a screen shot of this whoa!!!


As far as this trade goes it's a good one. A total steal if Exum still starts. Our bench was already deep. Now it's loaded if Hill comes off the bench.
 
[MENTION=228]green[/MENTION]

Cmon man. You scared?


Am I scared? Nope. I'm also not stupid. If this team stays healthy, they will get close to 50 wins. Hill isn't the answer. The bet you proposed is what a simple man would propose.

So, no. Why would I make a bet about win totals when the health of the Jazz will effect that a lot more than Hill will. Only an idiot would take that bet.
 
Hill hitting that age where guys often start to go downhill. If he does sign long term I hope he can still be a decent player.

Yeah, I remember Stockton losing a step when he turned 29 ... dude never amounted to much after that.
 
Back
Top