What's new
By:
Filters

George Hill finalizing 1 year deal w/Lakers

I like Rubio much better ,maybe Rubio gets Snyders offense an injection of some fastbreak basketball and Jazz can show off their young guys athleticism hidden in Snyders walk em up the court offense.
 
For 1 year deal, I would definitely take George Hill. Not sure of the $$$ being offered but if the Jazz could add a player option for year 2 that would be better than the laker deal. Hill could play alongside Rubio or sub him in 4th quarter


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz
 
Jack Strop said:
Pretty sure Hill is an unrestricted free agent. There's no right to match.
Click to expand...
I think he might mean that he'd match the structure of the deal in an offer for Hill to stay instead of jumping to the Lakers. Less playing time in Utah, but a better team around him and a shot at the playoffs this year. Utah could do it if they don't mind paying taxes from his contract.
 
I wouldn't try to re-sign Hill now. I suspect Hill would resent signing for less money than he was offered last winter -- doesn't matter it was his own fault, but human nature being what it is, he would still blame the Jazz for getting Rubio and denying him the opportunity to hold us hostage.
 
Ellipse said:
I wouldn't try to re-sign Hill now. I suspect Hill would resent signing for less money than he was offered last winter -- doesn't matter it was his own fault, but human nature being what it is, he would still blame the Jazz for getting Rubio and denying him the opportunity to hold us hostage.
Click to expand...

Someone who can't admit making a mistake and making moves to reduce the distance that results from it due to inability to eat their pride probably is someone to be wary about.
 
Last edited:
Ellis269 said:
I think he might mean that he'd match the structure of the deal in an offer for Hill to stay instead of jumping to the Lakers. Less playing time in Utah, but a better team around him and a shot at the playoffs this year. Utah could do it if they don't mind paying taxes from his contract.
Click to expand...

We've got a tremendous logjam at the one as it is. Fact is we just don't need him anymore and if you watched the Summer League game, Mitchell looked like a future All Star and will probably demand minutes (with his play) at both the one and the two.
 
Release the Kraken said:
We've got a tremendous logjam at the one as it is. Fact is we just don't need him anymore and if you watched the Summer League game, Mitchell looked like a future All Star and will probably demand minutes (with his play) at both the one and the two.
Click to expand...
Logjam? We have two rotation PGs and a reserve. How is that a logjam?

Sent from my A0001 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Ellis269 said:
Good for him. Glad the Jazz aren't paying that much. I think Sacramento might end up being a good fit for him. Lots of young guys who need some guidance and leadership.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I don't get the negativity towards Hill on jazzfanz. I'm happy he got a deal done.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Top