InGameStrategy
Well-Known Member
My source is as follows: "The three industries with the highest median percentage of salaries as a percentage of operating expense were health care services (52%), for-profit services (50%) and educational services (50%)." https://www.shrm.org/Research/Artic...thSalariesasPercentageofOperatingExpense.aspxI've worked in a couple of businesses (restaurants) where 50-55% of expenses going to labor was typical.
Not affirming that it is correct, just confirming that there was a source.
Looks like I do stand corrected on this. https://www.nhl.com/ice/page.htm?id=26366As has been mentiond, the NHL is currently at 57%.
However, some major key differences are that the NHL has a hard cap on maximum salary ($7.8 million, which is only modestly higher than the average salary in the NBA). Minimum salary is about $500,000.
Furthermore, and no less significantly, all existing player contracts were reduced by 24% in the 2005 NHL CBA.
Imagine the NBA superstars being presented with such a salary ceiling or instant pay cut.
Lastly, the NHL has invoked a hard cap.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NHL_salary_cap
So while it appears that I was incorrect regarding the player share, there are some other conditions in the NHL CBA that continue to bolster the notion that the NBA players are whining punks who are hurting themselves--and the sport--by letting this drag out, and are also risking further losses in negotiation beyond just a few percentage points. The owners are hurting the sport, too, but it is partly because they want to get the cost structure under control.
The real clincher is that the average and maximum salaries are soooo much higher in the NBA. The players are greedy and foolish not to accept that the overinflated honeymoon period is over and that 50-50 is still lavish.
Both the NHL and the NBA have 82-game seasons. I'd reckon that the risk of injury--at least dentally