FalseFlagg K
Well-Known Member
Burke + picks is the most i'd be happy with. I still think Burks skillset can be harnessed in a good team.
I looked at Teague's stats, he's overrated. Advanced stats are bad, defense is bad. I suspect even Burke + Burks is too much. Don't fool yourself with the "allstar" mention.
I'd still do it if it's Burke + filler, but that's all. Exum will be back next year and Burks is still improving. Offensively Burks is a top NBA talent (most underrated player according to D. Wade). It would be a mistake to trade him for a veteran with less than 2 years left on his contract.
The fact we don't have any mini albatross contracts hurts us dealing with them. If we were to take on Splitter it might get done without Hood. Hard to match up salaries.
Am I really to believe the Jazz are going to burn future 1st round picks in order to replace injured players for this season??
I can't see this deal happening.
Am I really to believe the Jazz are going to burn future 1st round picks in order to replace injured players for this season??
I can't see this deal happening.
Who to say this deal wouldn't happen even with Exum healthy?
Am I really to believe the Jazz are going to burn future 1st round picks in order to replace injured players for this season??
I can't see this deal happening.
If this trade went through tomorrow, and the jazz stayed healthy, then there's still a shot at the 5th seed.
Teague
Hood
Hayward
Favors
Gobert
^that's an absolutely legitimate starting 5.
I doubt Dante is better than Teague next year... this buys him time while we compete.
The more I think about it though i think I'd go Burke and Burks but that's it. AB is underrated and I think his absence has made me forget how good he is and can be.
With one of the worst if not the worst benches in the league. It's definitely a play of what the Jazz value more at this point.