Not sure Burke, Burks, and a non-lottery 1st moves the needle for Atlanta.
It's worth noting that they're the ones trying to resolve a logjam that could become volatile. They're placing the calls more than just taking them.
Not sure Burke, Burks, and a non-lottery 1st moves the needle for Atlanta.
They actually did provide a timeline.You're acting like it's my fault they don't provide a timeline.
It's worth noting that they're the ones trying to resolve a logjam that could become volatile. They're placing the calls more than just taking them.
Honestly, I hadn't really looked into how Teague was playing this year too much and was basing my opinion mostly off past play, after looking into this year I'm not really interested in him for anything near fair market value(which Burke/Burks/pick would be).
Schroder would be my preference of their PG's for sure.
Yeah, but reading the RealGM thread, fans there say they need small forwards.
Hood, Burke, and a top8 protected first. You willing to do that?
I wouldn't. Teague is just not that great, and I think Hood can be a killer offensive player.
I wouldn't. Teague is just not that great, and I think Hood can be a killer offensive player.
I wouldn't. Teague is just not that great, and I think Hood can be a killer offensive player.
Burke + Burks for Teague gets it done. Two promising young players who have proven themselves to be 16 ppg players with good contracts for a point guard that they are ready to move on. They get Schroeder and a really good backup point for a player who was an all star once. You don't need the 1st round pick there folks. And Hood is a piece that the Jazz have no interest in trading any time soon.
Maybe, but the issue remains for the Jazz : they desperately need a quality floor general. This is the key issue. You can have Burks and Hood an Hayward being all very good SG/SFs but this doesn't solve the main issue.