What's new
By:

Go Warren!

dalamon said:
warren won’t pick him, she’s corrupt. Just moved all of her big donor money from her senate campaign into the primaries— ten million worth.

Clinton 2.0 tbh
Click to expand...
FWIW the money she moved from her Senate campaign to the primaries is not purely "big donor money" she was funded 2:1 small donor to large. The ten million she moved over was what remained of the total amount raised.

I'm not sure that really equates to her being corrupt imo. I do think though, that shouldn't be allowed.
 
Zombie said:
FWIW the money she moved from her Senate campaign to the primaries is not purely "big donor money" she was funded 2:1 small donor to large. The ten million she moved over was what remained of the total amount raised.

I'm not sure that really equates to her being corrupt imo. I do think though, that shouldn't be allowed.
Click to expand...

Keep in mind that Warren made a big deal about accepting zero big-donor money for the duration of the *primary* (which already was easy to critique), and now even this has been compromised. No moral backbone, as I've been saying.
 
I thought it was about exactly my feelings on the subject until the "assuming you can find one". Denigrating religion is a great way to alienate a pretty solid chunk of voters. Assuming it came from a man was pretty telling too. But there are real people with that exact question. Her answer said that all of those people are nothing but the butt of the inside jokes who deserve to be belittled and insulted. Not a good look actually.
 
LogGrad98 said:
I thought it was about exactly my feelings on the subject until the "assuming you can find one". Denigrating religion is a great way to alienate a pretty solid chunk of voters. Assuming it came from a man was pretty telling too. But there are real people with that exact question. Her answer said that all of those people are nothing but the butt of the inside jokes who deserve to be belittled and insulted. Not a good look actually.
Click to expand...
She assumed he could find one.

That was my favorite part.
 
Stoked said:
Warren is gaining steam.

https://news.google.com/articles/CAIiEMWwAeAH0kORG95TsO4-UTEqGQgEKhAIACoHCAowyNj6CjDyiPICMK_dxAU?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en

so, does anyone else think that Hillary would be pissed if the first female president is elected right after she ran?
Click to expand...

Im guessing Sanders voter's with concerns about his health defect to Warren not Biden.

Hillary will simply claim that she was the real trail blazer that made it possible for other women to follow in her footsteps. And that without her none of this c ould happen. Realistically you're due a female President can anyone else think of a major western democracy that hasn't had a female leader?

Japan? France? Has Canada? (Not really a significant democracy tho.)
 
LogGrad98 said:
I thought it was about exactly my feelings on the subject until the "assuming you can find one". Denigrating religion is a great way to alienate a pretty solid chunk of voters. Assuming it came from a man was pretty telling too. But there are real people with that exact question. Her answer said that all of those people are nothing but the butt of the inside jokes who deserve to be belittled and insulted. Not a good look actually.
Click to expand...

Its ok to be bigoted against white Christian males according to the left. This shouldnt be a surprise anymore. They dont even deny it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top