What's new

Good Article About People Getting Offended

Just look at the recent Rush Limbaugh crap.

The left goes crazy and points out that so many of Rush's sponsors have left him. Reality was that there weren't that many, and for each one that left, many more were happy to take their place.
But here is where it gets interesting: THere is now proof that Media Matters and other lefties have been doing a coordinated effort to send fake outrage to other Rush sponsors to get them to think there is this groundswell of rage against Rush.
Totally manufactured.
Now why would they do this? Because there is no outrage. Nobody gives a damn if Rush called a slut a slut. But when the left wants something bad enough, reality doesn't mean a thing.

The ACTUAL reality is that the sponsors that did actually pull their ads have suffered for it.

This is important to point about because it's not just people whining, it's people out there actively picking up anything they can twist to fit their definition of offensive and trying to chill free speech in the process and create active media distractions as their occupation. Those are the people we need to start calling out more because a lot of the whining is rooted from their faux outrage and then picked up by mainstream media and politicians and go wildfire from there. I'm tried of seeing this **** constantly on news sites when I make my daily news run.
 
The thing is. I don't think most people are really offended. They are using fake outrage as a tool.


If we want to use the flopping analogy again...how do you stop players from flopping? Don't call fouls when they flop.
How do you stop all the fake offending? Don't reward them for it.
 
Is it really an insult to call someone what they are?


Pure conjecture on your part as you do not know her.

As for the comment about people not really caring. I think that people generally are outraged. They are outraged at all the fake BS the left and right are doing and saying.
 
Pure conjecture on your part as you do not know her.

.

Well, I can infer some things.

She said herself that she wants free contraception so that she can have all the sex she wants. She isn't married. Having multiple partners. That's a slut.

It also turns out that she is 30 years old and is not just a student, but a full time political activist who only enrolled at Georgetown so that she can cause problems and try to force a liberal agenda onto the university.
Plus, her whole appearance before congress was not actually before congress. She was handpicked by Pelosi to pose as a concerned student, but since Pelosi didn't follow procedure and tried to sneak her in, she was refused and all that she said was actually at a press conference that Pelosi tried to pass off as a speach before congress.
So that would make her a political slut.
 
Back
Top