What's new
By:

Gordon is awesome, essential, our Lebron thread

Mission Accomplished said:
Not in these highlights. And when Kanter was losing so were the Jazz btw.
Click to expand...

Just to justify my point (not that I have to with you). The Jazz record when Gordon Hayward goes for 20 points or more is 22-13. So we win a lot more when Gordon plays well.

BTW the Jazz record this year when Kanter went for over 20 points. 1-5, and the one win Gordon went for 20 also.
 
Mission Accomplished said:
Like I've said you are off topic. But, this is therapy for you. Sure those are the players and front office folk I dont like. I dont mind DL the Kanter trade was dumb. Not because we lost Kanter. I dont really mind that. We should have gotten something back.
Click to expand...

We got exactly what he was worth at the point we decided to trade him. Would you have preferred we let him play out the season and let him go for nothing?
 
Ben10 said:
Just to justify my point (not that I have to with you). The Jazz record when Gordon Hayward goes for 20 points or more is 22-13. So we win a lot more when Gordon plays well.

BTW the Jazz record this year when Kanter went for over 20 points. 1-5, and the one win Gordon went for 20 also.
Click to expand...

Was Gordo not on the floor when Kanter was racking up these losses? Because just because Gordon didnt contribute doesnt give the loss to Kanter.
 
Mission Accomplished said:
Was Gordo not on the floor when Kanter was racking up these losses? Because just because Gordon didnt contribute doesnt give the loss to Kanter.
Click to expand...

Not really. Jazz only were playing winning ball when Hayward was on the court. When Kanter was on the court, the team was losing. So just think, with Hayward on the court, the Jazz were winning (more like even when I looked in January) while Kanter was the worst on the team. Just imagine how bad it was when Hayward on the bench and Kanter was playing.
 
Mission Accomplished said:
Was Gordo not on the floor when Kanter was racking up these losses? Because just because Gordon didnt contribute doesnt give the loss to Kanter.
Click to expand...

Again completely off the point of the conversation we were having. What I said is we win more when Gordon plays well then we don't. Kanter the opposite. Our win loss totals when they scored over 20 points per game (playing well) Gordon wins. Kanter losses. Pretty simple. Or do we need to bring out the teams plus/minus with Gordon on off the floor compared with Kanters. It isn't pretty just so you know.
 
#1 defense and 14-7 since the trade (55 win pace), even w/ Hayward and Favors both missing multiple games.

God I'm so glad the Jazz got rid of that giant moron.
 
KD's Framily said:
#1 defense and 14-7 since the trade (55 win pace), even w/ Hayward and Favors both missing multiple games.

God I'm so glad the Jazz got rid of that giant moron.
Click to expand...

And of those 7 losses 5 of them are by 4 points or less (4, 3, 3, 2, 1). Jazz were in and damn near won everyone of those 5 games.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top