Great Hayward Article from The Ringer

[Gobzilla]

I honestly don't see him leaving. After helping build this team, as soon as they are starting to be a really good team/contender, he leaves? Just doesn't make sense to me.

 

[LogGrad98]

I think if we had crapped out of the first round it would have been an even-money bet that Hayward would leave. But after winning the first round series and having a chance to make some noise against golden state I think that will entice him to stay.

 

[fishonjazz]

Hayward isn't going anywhere.
$$$

 

[Carbon13]

I think I did a bad job reading... was really only the two things I noted.

I still think the simmons Stockton omission was egregious... I just don't see how you can put CP3 and Nash ahead of what Stockton accomplished. Would have been a 2 time champ had he not run into the GOAT and set records that are likely never broken.

This article literally had nothing to do with Stockton.

 

[b_line]

I think the jazz still have a lot of improvement. A healthy favors is better than any big the Celtics have after horford. Gobert is a beast, and a healthy George Hill is probably more impactful than IT, since he is 5'7".

Add all that together, as well as the fact that he is universally loved in a city where his team is top dog, and that's a pretty attractive offer, not to mention the jazz can offer more money.

All this is a moot point if he makes all NBA. He will be a jazz lifer if that happens.

 

[VINYLONE]

Just skim read that ****... was basically an article about how Gordon is probably leaving... "desperate billboard" the Hornets paraphrase is ummm awful. I hate Bill Simmons and some of the Ringer crap.

Bill put Stockton outside his top 7 pgs all time... even missed him initially in his "next 5". Most national guys are pretty fair... Bill is an ***.

Wait what? Im confused. Is there a different article that I am supposed to read?