yeah milsap the guy who was +15 on the court, the highest of any jazz member
+/- is a retarded statistic to use to prove anything, especially in one game.
yeah milsap the guy who was +15 on the court, the highest of any jazz member
Not without Harden they don't. OKC is very good, but we could have beat them tonight. Only lost the last game by 4.
+/- is a retarded statistic to use to prove anything, especially in one game.
why? because you said so?
yeah milsap the guy who was +15 on the court, the highest of any jazz member
All blaming Millsap but at least he played decent defense. Booker got 30 minutes and brought almost nothing on the table, he was running around for nothing. He is hesitant to close around the rim, he does not rebound on defense, he can't shoot free throws.
No. Because there's 19 other variables that go into that number that have nothing to do with the player.
lets also remember we are missing two starters.
Except our team is completely ****ing different than theirs. They had a good PG, a superb two-way big, and a good scoring PF. Zero wings.
We have arguably the best trio of young wings in the NBA (all who complement each other differently), inferior PGs, an incredible two-way big and a defensive stud at the 5.
Any talk about ceilings for this team is so ****ing insane. The truth is this: we have no ****ing idea. All that we know is we need to take the long-term growth route. Patience.