Stifle Tower
Punch Bowl Re-Filler
We definitely don't have a "Core 5". We have a "Core 1", a PG who is 95% off limits, and 3 other guys could just as easily be dealt as stick around.
More accurately, we have a "Core 3" which includes Favors, Burke, and the lottery pick. That's not a value assessment of the players, it's pure salary practicality. Burke and the lottery pick can play alongside Favors at an extremely cheap price with maximum cap flexibility. Imagine having a true "Core 3" that only accounted for roughly 20 million in payroll for the next 3-4 seasons.
Hayward, Burks, and Kanter are all assets to bolster that 3. The conventional angle would be to overpay Hayward and create a Core 4 with little hope of keeping both Kanter and Burks, but eventually flipping them for future assets. The other, and in my opinion better, route to take would be to shop Hayward and spend another year evaluating Burks and Kanter before their RFA seasons.
I don't see Burke as a "top-10" PG. If he is, he's definitely on the fringe of that range. No one is untouchable, although Favors is now locked up. As for Hayward, I have mixed feelings. Every season he has started slowly and then caught fire from January forward.
Jazz made the mistake of overpaying for a SF in AK47, but I think/hope Hayward is different. He'll come cheaper than AK since there is a limit on how much the Jazz would need to pay: even "MAX" (and I'm not saying pay him that much!) would still be cheaper than AK. Also, isn't another team restricted to offering one less season than what the Jazz could? Even having Favors and Hayward at $23-$24M combined would NOT preclude the team from giving contracts to Burks, Kanter and then Burke. They'll be over the cap in future seasons, but can still stay under the luxury tax limit. And some of those contracts will be expiring just as this year's picks come off their rookie deals. That's the time the Jazz will have to look at their "Core5 + the two #1's this season + Gobert and decide who goes/who stays.