What's new

Hayward, Favors, Gobert, Booker

No offense to OP.. but not only is the sample size too small (no offense, kkk), but it's so small that the thread is dumb. Again, no offense.
 
No offense to OP.. but not only is the sample size too small (no offense, kkk), but it's so small that the thread is dumb. Again, no offense.
offense-taken.jpg
 
No offense to OP.. but not only is the sample size too small (no offense, kkk), but it's so small that the thread is dumb.

Says the statistics guru who told in an earlier post he did not know what std-dev is.
Willing to bet top guys will change after 82 games?
 
I'm still a fan of playing Hayward at SG, unless there's a match-up problem (e.g., Harden). I think his size and physicality are an advantage there, and he can play as part of a 2-guard front. Exum and Hayward would give us size and versatility in the backcourt and could become one of the better combinations in the league. Then we can play a real 3/D player at the SF, then bring Burks off the bench and swing Hayward to SF in the 2nd unit, where he can be a more prominent initiator.
I miss Hayward at the 2. I'd like to see DL make a run at PJ3 in the offseason to add more length to the starting line up.
 
These four guys in order seem to the best performers of the Utah Jazz. These numbers are "Wins Produced", a similar metric to PER. (info)

VyHN5p4.png


I love when stats backup the eye test.

I love when stats backup the eye test.

Sample size is limited but this is still important because the variance is significant, I mean there is huge disparity between some players. Though keep in mind Kanter is rising recently, will soon be a + guy but still far away from the top dogs.

WP48 still has Hayward at #1, but Gobert marginally passes Favors to take 2nd place.

I love when stats backup the eye test.
 
Back
Top