Darkwing Duck
Well-Known Member
This thread has amused me.
Hayward contract is 4 years long (with the 4 year being a player option).
No one is going to give Burks a big contract. 1 dimensional, 1 side of teh floor player.
Kanter might be a different story. He could easily get a max offer if he performs this year.
By this you mean if he terribly underperforms and disappoints everyone, right?
I'm trying to understand what the significance of 4th year player option is vs straight 4 year deal and how than can be bad. Anyone enlighten me please.
If he had come out and proved he was a #1 option to the tune of 22 6 and 6 with good percentages, like some were predicting, do you know what he would've been offered? This exact contract. Just doesn't seem right. He was disappointing this year, few deny that. And no one was talking about a max deal last offseason.I wouldn't say Hayward terribly underperformed. He shot poorly from deep and went through the motions on a team going through the motions.
He showed his skillset, which is why teams like him so much. Teams are enamored if he can bring that skillset, and bring back his sharpshooting, for a total package.
TruthBright-side: Jazzfanz.com has an early front-runner for "scape-goat for the next 4 years" category.