What's new
By:

Hillary Clinton says Tulsi Gabbard is a 'Russian asset' groomed to ensure Trump reelection

Also claimed Jill Stein in 2016 was a Russian “asset” lmfao.

if she had anything beyond wild, irresponsible conjecture she would, and should, come forward with it.
 
My little boy had to ask me what I was crackin up about while we were playing ball.. I was thinking Tulsi is up there talking about love & healing the nation and the left is like "it's a RuSSIAN PLANT!!"

omg that's some comedy - a hindu Russian agent
 
You may not like where the message is coming from but if there’s going to be a Jill Stein like spoiler in 2020 wouldn’t Tulsi be it? You may not like the messenger but is the message wrong? Now if Tulsi goes 3rd party, she’ll only prove Clinton right.

before we immediately dismiss the things clinton says, let’s remember:



Was she wrong? So if you hate the messenger please specify that you do. I can understand Clinton fatigue. If you disagree with the message, please explain why because I think Clinton might be onto something. Judging by her history, she’s probably right.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Thriller said:
You may not like where the message is coming from but if there’s going to be a Jill Stein like spoiler in 2020 wouldn’t Tulsi be it? You may not like the messenger but is the message wrong? Now if Tulsi goes 3rd party, she’ll only prove Clinton right.
Click to expand...
The message that Gabbard is being groomed by Russia and is an asset of Russia is completely unsubstantiated.

Russia can prefer non-interventionist candidates without those candidates working for Russia or even liking Russia. If Gabbard has been emailing Russian intelligence personnel or setting up meetings with them in hotel rooms then sure, reason to be suspicious, but there is no evidence of anything like that.

Hillary isn't helping. She's irrelevant as far as I'm concerned and she should go away.
 
Gameface said:
The message that Gabbard is being groomed by Russia and is an asset of Russia is completely unsubstantiated.

Russia can prefer non-interventionist candidates without those candidates working for Russia or even liking Russia. If Gabbard has been emailing Russian intelligence personnel or setting up meetings with them in hotel rooms then sure, reason to be suspicious, but there is no evidence of anything like that
Hillary isn't helping. She's irrelevant as far as I'm concerned and she should go away.
Click to expand...

I think it depends on what she means by “groomed.” Seems to me like Tulsi has got all the Russian arguments down. She blames us for everything while never speaking ill of Assad and Putin. Russian troll farms seem to promote Tulsi over any other candidate. And Tulsi has shown a willingness to publicly attack the party. We already have evidence that Russian money has funded other political campaigns. Has Russian money found its way into Tulsi’s war chest? I think there’s substantial reason for concern that Russia is going to use Tulsi to help re-elect Donald.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top