What's new
By:

Hillary Clinton says Tulsi Gabbard is a 'Russian asset' groomed to ensure Trump reelection

NPC D4617 said:
Well, the Liberal crowd will believe anything that their side says, so...

If they are throwing this obvious nonsense at at Tulsi its gotta make you wonder just how legitimate the things they say about Trump are.

The left is just so beyond disrespectful to our military. Unbelievable.
Click to expand...
Clinton isn’t “the Left” you ****ing dimwit.
 
Gameface said:
The message that Gabbard is being groomed by Russia and is an asset of Russia is completely unsubstantiated.

Russia can prefer non-interventionist candidates without those candidates working for Russia or even liking Russia. If Gabbard has been emailing Russian intelligence personnel or setting up meetings with them in hotel rooms then sure, reason to be suspicious, but there is no evidence of anything like that.

Hillary isn't helping. She's irrelevant as far as I'm concerned and she should go away.
Click to expand...

I’ll also add that I’d be fine to never hear from the Clintons again. Their time has past. I have doubts over whether her comments help too. My qualm is with the messenger. How would this be treated if Biden, Sanders, or Warren had said this exact same thing? Would it be more or less credible?

I do have questions on what Tulsi is trying to accomplish here. Why else would Clinton be speaking out?
 
The Thriller said:
I think it depends on what she means by “groomed.” Seems to me like Tulsi has got all the Russian arguments down. She blames us for everything while never speaking ill of Assad and Putin. Russian troll farms seem to promote Tulsi over any other candidate. And Tulsi has shown a willingness to publicly attack the party. We already have evidence that Russian money has funded other political campaigns. Has Russian money found its way into Tulsi’s war chest? I think there’s substantial reason for concern that Russia is going to use Tulsi to help re-elect Donald.
Click to expand...
Nothing has been substantiated. At all. The DNC has earned its reputation as being corrupt. They’re vastly preferable to the GOP which says a lot about the garbage going on in this country.
 
The Thriller said:
I’ll also add that I’d be fine to never hear from the Clintons again. Their time has past. I have doubts over whether her comments help too. My qualm is with the messenger. How would this be treated if Biden, Sanders, or Warren had said this exact same thing? Would it be more or less credible?

I do have questions on what Tulsi is trying to accomplish here. Why else would Clinton be speaking out?
Click to expand...
She’s trying to become president.

???
 
NUMBERICA said:
Nothing has been substantiated. At all. The DNC has earned its reputation as being corrupt. They’re vastly preferable to the GOP which says a lot about the garbage going on in this country.
Click to expand...

You’re not wrong. But doesn’t this feel eerily similar to 2015-2016 when there were concerns over Russian interference into Stein’s and Trump’s campaigns? I remember people on this board criticizing me for daring to question Donald’s loyalties.

How’d that work out?

What’s Clinton’s motivation here? Tulsi isn’t hurting Biden’s campaign. Is Clinton trying to sink Tulsi for Warren or Sanders? If she wasn’t legitimately concerned with Tulsi’s threat as a spoiler 3rd party candidate, why else would she be concerned with her? I think Clinton’s concerns shouldn’t immediately be dismissed.
 
NUMBERICA said:
She’s trying to become president.

???
Click to expand...

By consistently polling in the bottom 3 of a 12 member primary? By attacking the party? By taking some of the most conservative positions of all the candidates in a progressive party? That’s laughable.

The other reason to stay in is to promote something. What’s she trying to promote? Castro is trying to promote immigration, Beto gun reform, Yang is giving money away for votes... So I understand why they’re battling. What’s Tulsi trying to promote?
 
The Thriller said:
By consistently polling in the bottom 3 of a 12 member primary? By attacking the party? By taking some of the most conservative positions of all the candidates in a progressive party? That’s laughable.

The other reason to stay in is to promote something. What’s she trying to promote? Castro is trying to promote immigration, Beto gun reform, Yang is giving money away for votes... So I understand why they’re battling. What’s Tulsi trying to promote?
Click to expand...
Non-interventionism
 
NUMBERICA said:
Clinton isn’t “the Left” you ****ing dimwit.
Click to expand...

No **** you ****ing idiot. She pretends to be though.

Just curious, is this how you talk in real life? Just going around screaming profanity at everyone who doesnt agree with you?
 
Last edited:
Gameface said:
Non-interventionism
Click to expand...

Maybe. That could be her schtick. I hope it is. And if it is, I’m hoping her experience in the armed forces helps her to connect with people in the future and helps us to avoid senseless conflicts. However, it’s time to drop out. Same with Beto honestly.

Doesn’t it seem odd that she doesn’t seem to ever want to criticize Assad or Putin? And does the party that has been criticized for most of my life for being foreign policy doves need someone preaching non-interventionism?
 
Gameface said:
Non-interventionism
Click to expand...

Ya, thats what she said. She also hold positions that are left leaning like Medicare for all. Not sure why Thriller is trying to smear her as right wing.

Who needs someone's words when you can just smear them and put words in there mouth.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top