What's new

Hillary Clinton says Tulsi Gabbard is a 'Russian asset' groomed to ensure Trump reelection

"We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term,” Mueller added. “Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.”

Is this really difficult to understand?
But members of the campaign were charged and convicted.
Is that hard to understand?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Sure. I can help you. Here. Go to the section Myth: Mueller found “no collusion”: It concludes by stating “while none of these acts amounted to the crime of conspiracy, all could be described as “collusion”. There’s a section on the “no obstruction” myth as well:

,https://time.com/5610317/mueller-report-myths-breakdown/
"We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term,” Mueller added. “Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.”
 
"We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term,” Mueller added. “Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.”
But members of the campaign were charged and convicted.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Lol RQD, Qne Brow, and 2 Pie
Would this be the same as Hunter Biden committing a felony gun crime, not being charged, and then blaming Joe Biden?
arctic-circle-menu-halibut-shrimp-chicken-salads-originals-jpg.10879
 
Lets be clear... Hillary Clinton paid Steele money for a Dossier on Trump that we now know was Russian propaganda. HIllary legitimately colluded and Obamas FBI lied to courts to illegally spy on the Trump campaign all over Russian propaganda. This is fact... Not some alt left Time article.
 
Collusion... AP leans left.

The Democratic Party-financed dossier, once celebrated by liberal Washington politicians and journalists, is officially debunked, according to a review of special counsel Robert Mueller’s 448-page investigative report.

Dossier creator Christopher Steele, who was paid with money from the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee, leveled at least a dozen Russian election conspiracy charges against President Trump and associates.

Virtually all his information came from Kremlin intelligence, according to the dossier. Mrs. Clinton’s operatives spread the document to the Justice Department, the FBI and news outlets.

 
Yup... Just maybe. Hypothetically.

Conspiracy....
This is very, very deceptive of you, amounting to taking a part of my quote out of context to falsely paint it into a different context. That is 100% dishonest of you. My full quote was “So maybe the full memo is right around the corner”, meaning, as you know, since you are deliberately leaving out the full sentence, that maybe we will eventually see Barr’s memo. I was not talking about hypothetical conspiracies at all, but simply the release of the memo. And you know that. I do try to address you respectfully, but I do totally understand the game you are playing, and that you have no intention of being honest within any of the threads you’ve rejoined since your return. This particular sleight of hand on your part is silly I think. You really cannot win with me. I may allow you to think you have at times, by simply not replying to a particular retort on your part, but you can’t beat me.
 
Off
This is very, very deceptive of you, amounting to taking a part of my quote out of context to falsely paint it into a different context. That is 100% dishonest of you. My full quote was “So maybe the full memo is right around the corner”, meaning, as you know, since you are deliberately leaving out the full sentence, that maybe we will eventually see Barr’s memo. I was not talking about hypothetical conspiracies at all, but simply the release of the memo. And you know that. I do try to address you respectfully, but I do totally understand the game you are playing, and that you have no intention of being honest within any of the threads you’ve rejoined since your return. This particular sleight of hand on your part is silly I think. You really cannot win with me. I may allow you to think you have at times, by simply not replying to a particular retort on your part, but you can’t beat me.
I posted a direct quote from Mueller saying there wasn't substantial evidence to charge anybody. You are saying he's wrong. Who's being disingenuous here?
 
It's like the New York DA coming out and saying that Trump was under criminal investigation. Now we know there are only minor minor very minor infractions that arent even going to amount to nothing more than a fine.

Propaganda
 
Back
Top