♪alt13
Well-Known Member
Now that is a more logical approach but that is not the way he was presenting them. If that is what he was trying then Jesus he did a bad job.
He did say "to be fair"..."take it for what it's worth"..."may not suck as bad"
Now that is a more logical approach but that is not the way he was presenting them. If that is what he was trying then Jesus he did a bad job.
Maybe Gobert was covering for Exum mistakes on defense too and that's why Exum looked good defensively?Gobert can cover for Burke's numerous mistakes so Burke must not really be that bad!
.
Here's what he said.He blamed Burke's bad D on Kanter. Kanter's D did suck but that is shoddy work on whitewashing Burke's own poor D.
Gobert can cover for Burke's numerous mistakes so Burke must not really be that bad!
That is directly the Kanter blame game.
Edit: One can pick a stat to support almost anything so yes they can often be miss used.
For example. Burke shot 55% on spot ups so he has good efficiency. When one takes a closer look they realize there is more to the story.
He's making the point that Trey's defensive rating suffered from playing with Kanter. The numbers seem to bear him out. I guess you can interpret that as Locke playing a Kanter blame game if you want, but I don't see it that way. He didn't say Trey was a good defender and Locke also posted the second set of numbers comparing Exum and Burke when playing with Gobert and Favors. It is much easier to play defense on the perimeter when you have great defensive bigs behind you. Opposing guards are less likely to drive and are challenged when they do.Trey Burke defensive rating with Enes Kanter was 110.1. With Rudy Gobert was 99.7. Lots of Trey bad defense was who he was with.
Here's what he said. He's making the point that Trey's defensive rating suffered from playing with Kanter. The numbers seem to bear him out. I guess you can interpret that as Locke playing a Kanter blame game if you want, but I don't see it that way. He didn't say Trey was a good defender and Locke also posted the second set of numbers comparing Exum and Burke when playing with Gobert and Favors. It is much easier to play defense on the perimeter when you have great defensive bigs behind you. Opposing guards are less likely to drive and are challenged when they do.
Locke is in full spin mode this morning.
He is doing damage control by playing up Burke. Using isolated stats like +/- and saying things like ""Lots of Trey bad defense was who he was with". That's a direct reference and blame game on Kanter.
Horrible logic. Ugh, come on Locke.
All those tweets are about whitewashing Burke's bad D. You don't want to see it that way then fine. I do and it's a bad argument.
That doesn't make you right. Locke is a numbers guy so he's tweeting out numbers on something that everyone is talking about. Maybe it's an effort to talk Jazz fans away from the edge, but it's not some big Jazz conspiracy to make everyone think Trey is a great defender.You don't want to see it that way then fine. I do and it's a bad argument.
Locke is great at finding stats that fit his current opinion on the team. His current opinion on the team is always the company line that they want to push. ALWAYS. And he will find #'s to fit the new company line as soon as it changes. This is the guy that was loving Kanter till he was traded then he had #'s to show he's not worth it. While he was here he had #'s to show he was a good fit and deserved his minutes. His stats are virtually worthless because he only hunts down the ones that back his standing. And dismisses any that don't, until they serve his purpose that is.That doesn't make you right. Locke is a numbers guy so he's tweeting out numbers on something that everyone is talking about. Maybe it's an effort to talk Jazz fans away from the edge, but it's not some big Jazz conspiracy to make everyone think Trey is a great defender.