How dumb are West Valley Police?

[The Thriller]

Thanks





Now let's not resort to name calling and Beantown is a good dude so lay off.
Someone a little sensitive that I called him PK for calling Hayward Kid Balla?
Take it out on me, not Beantown.

Huh? I'm calling you out on a series of bad posts.

This is a big deal. The police closed the case without ever actually solving it. If there wasn't any hope to solve it then why did they run off to Oregon on a tip that Susan's body was up there? Many folks had hopes that this would finally put to rest this case.
Combine that with the recent findings of the WVPD, and many folks are upset. If you don't care about this case and feel like it's yesterday's news, then don't post. No one forced you to enter this thread. If you are hurt by me calling you out then put me on your ignore list. It's not that hard. The rest of us would like to continue to talk about this. It's a big deal. If you could interview Susan's family I'm pretty sure they'd tell you how angry they are at the way this case has been handled.

 

[Jazz Spazz]

Huh? I'm calling you out on a series of bad posts.

This is a big deal. The police closed the case without ever actually solving it. If there wasn't any hope to solve it then why did they run off to Oregon on a tip that Susan's body was up there? Many folks had hopes that this would finally put to rest this case.
Combine that with the recent findings of the WVPD, and many folks are upset. If you don't care about this case and feel like it's yesterday's news, then don't post. No one forced you to enter this thread. If you are hurt by me calling you out then put me on your ignore list. It's not that hard. The rest of us would like to continue to talk about this. It's a big deal. If you could interview Susan's family I'm pretty sure they'd tell you how angry they are at the way this case has been handled.

Oh, okay. Thanks for the advice. You're a real friend.

How do I find this ignore list you talk so much about? TIA

P.S. If you don't like me posting in threads you care about, can you also put me on your ignore list thing, just in case? TIA again.

Oh, before we never talk again, what exactly was the series of posts I was being called out on, I want to be clear. Was it all 4946, or just the last few? TIA again, again.

um..... one last thing. Oh, wait, there isn't another thing. TIA again, again, again.

Okay, continue complaining about the world.

Bye

Cya

Later Gater

Hasta Pasta

See ya Rhea

Bye Fly

I'm going to miss you <--------------------------- (sar chasm)

 

[Bronco70]

What's Spazz yammering about this time? I have him on ignore...

 

[Jazz Spazz]

What's Spazz yammering about this time? I have him on ignore...

Not that you'll see this, but I guess I'll add you to the list too as soon as Thriller tells me where it is.
I'm disappointed, a fellow Niner/Giant fan ignoring me. pffft

 

[Bronco70]

Not that you'll see this, but I guess I'll add you to the list too as soon as Thriller tells me where it is.
I'm disappointed, a fellow Niner/Giant fan ignoring me. pffft

It's alright. I still read your posts as my alt, E.J. Wells.

 

[Jazz Spazz]

It's alright. I still read your posts as my alt, E.J. Wells.

Okay, I'll just see if I can bring Sloanfeld back so I can read yours.

 

[Bronco70]

Okay, I'll just see if I can bring Sloanfeld back so I can read yours.

I've wondered where the voice of wisdom and reason has been...

 

[Beantown]

We should convict of murder without having a dead body.

There is no law that you can't convict a murderer without the body.

 

[Chad Feldheimer]

There is no law that you can't convict a murderer without the body.

You can convict someone with circumstantial evidence, which is all they had.

 

[Scat]

You can convict someone with circumstantial evidence, which is all they had.

The jury has to find that there is no reasonable doubt that he committed the murder. Do I think he did it? Absolutely. If I was on the jury would I find him guilty? I doubt it. There simply was not a single thing that absolutely proved beyond doubt that Josh killed her and disposed of her body.

 

[babe]

The case is now officially closed and the fact that they never arrested Josh Powell is just mind blowing. He had the absolute worst story ever!

-He takes his kids "camping" in the middle of the night during a snow storm on a Sunday night while his "wife is sleeping". He doesn't call into work that he won't be there. His only excuse is he thought it was Saturday night.

-He was having an affair with a prostitute months leading up to her disappearance

-Josh had his wife's phone with him and he had removed the SIM card.

-A drop of her blood was found on the carpet next to carpet that had just been recently cleaned

-Josh never went out and looked for his wife, while clearing out her retirement accounts.

-He had rented a car the day after the disappearance and put over 800 miles on it in just 2 days, why in the hell was he not followed?

Here is the link to the story. This is just crazy. That whole department should be ashamed of themselves. They possibly could have prevented the murder of the two boys.


https://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/05/20/utah-police-close-investigation-into-disappearance-susan-powell/

Sorry, I'm going off without reading the thread.

The WVC cops are pretty stupid. You can find them dunkin' donuts at 7-11 all night long.

I agree with you, there are some items here that I haven't heard before.

I think it was a case of legal over-caution, the cops knew he did it, so did the attorneys who were making the case. But they did not want to risk having to let him slip out because of any question a judge or jury might think gave reasonable doubt.

That over-caution cost the kids their lives.

 

[franklin]

The jury has to find that there is no reasonable doubt that he committed the murder. Do I think he did it? Absolutely. If I was on the jury would I find him guilty? I doubt it. There simply was not a single thing that absolutely proved beyond doubt that Josh killed her and disposed of her body.

Concise, tried to rep. Were u serious about losing an arm bruh?

 

[Stifle Tower]

A lot of evidence that is suspicious but nothing that I have seen that is proof that he 100% killed her.

1. Prove that she is dead? Body?
2. Prove that she was murdered?
3. If so, prove she was definitely murdered by Josh and not her father-in-law?


For the record I do think he killed her but no concrete evidence on how and who killed her.

Precisely. Look, everyone KNOWS Josh was involved. But they can't prove it. Any attorney would have an easy time convincing a jury there was "reasonable doubt." Josh is SCUM and very likely a murdering POS. But legally, it can't be proved.

 

[moevillini]

There is no law that you can't convict a murderer without the body.

What does this have to do with Sloanfeld? He wasn't murdered was he?

 

[nightmare3983]

Precisely. Look, everyone KNOWS Josh was involved. But they can't prove it. Any attorney would have an easy time convincing a jury there was "reasonable doubt." Josh is SCUM and very likely a murdering POS. But legally, it can't be proved.

He killed his kids. He IS a murdering POS. There's no "very likely" about it.

 

[gregbroncs]

We should convict of murder without having a dead body.

This is awesome. So next time I want to kill somebody I just have to make sure the body is never found. Good to know.

 

[Beantown]

Sorry, I'm going off without reading the thread.

The WVC cops are pretty stupid. You can find them dunkin' donuts at 7-11 all night long.

I agree with you, there are some items here that I haven't heard before.

I think it was a case of legal over-caution, the cops knew he did it, so did the attorneys who were making the case. But they did not want to risk having to let him slip out because of any question a judge or jury might think gave reasonable doubt.

That over-caution cost the kids their lives.

I agree, the worst thing would have been him getting a not guilty verdict. Plus nobody could have really known that he would possibility kill his kids. But I still think he should have been followed constantly after his wife's disappearance. The fact the he drove 800 miles in a rented car just days after her disappearance and the cops have no idea where he went is inexcusable. He should have been watched like a hawk.

Also went ever happened to interrogation? They should of had a enough evidence to grill his *** for hours and hours at the police station.

 

[Gameface]

This is awesome. So next time I want to kill somebody I just have to make sure the body is never found. Good to know.

This isn't new info... If you can successfully make a person disappear without any traces of them or anyone seeing then you've got a good shot at getting away with murder. Even with a cover story as ridiculous as Josh Powell's.

 

[gregbroncs]

I agree, the worst thing would have been him getting a not guilty verdict. Plus nobody could have really known that he would possibility kill his kids. But I still think he should have been followed constantly after his wife's disappearance. The fact the he drove 800 miles in a rented car just days after her disappearance and the cops have no idea where he went is inexcusable. He should have been watched like a hawk.

Also went ever happened to interrogation? They should of had a enough evidence to grill his *** for hours and hours at the police station.

Just because you ask questions does not mean he is required to answer them. Also he would have had an attorney present to consult him not to answer. They were not going to get a confession.

 

[gregbroncs]

This isn't new info... If you can successfully make a person disappear without any traces of them or anyone seeing then you've got a good shot at getting away with murder. Even with a cover story as ridiculous as Josh Powell's.

I understand that. But his statement was so stupid I had to say something.