We do not have the talent on our roster to make nearly as much noise as Chicago. They've got a great all-around team to go with an excellent, devoted coach. Would we do better? Sure, but we wouldn't be at the top of our conference or anywhere near it. Chicago is the best team in the East right now and arguably the best team since the All-Star break. They've got a lot of talent on that team and an MVP in Rose.
I disagree. How many people would imagine Chicago to be in the current situation right now in the beginning of the year?
And i dont think they have better talent than us, they just play defense, which is a mentality brought by Thibodeau, as well he did to Boston 2 yrs ago
If we compare the players one by one,
Rose may be mvp this year but noone can convince me that he is better player overall than Deron. Deron is a proven playoff player but we will see Roses flaws better in the playoffs. He is too much individual as a pg shouldnt be.
Jefferson is better than Boozer in my opinion even though i dont think he is one of the best pfs in the game.
Millsap is better than Noah
Kirilenko is also not worse than Deng overall
Memo was injured all year but if we should compare, he is better than both Gibson or Thomas
And as much as raja bell isnt good, he isnt worse than Bogans
i think only difference makers were the bench players,
while we had inconsistent miles, rookie hayward and clumsy fesenko
they had korver, brewer and omer asik(imo one of the best defenders in the league among all big man)
But generally, i dont think they have better talent than us.
And i think, as much as a symbol sloan was, lets accept his flaws and lack of flexibility in certain situations
I believe Thibodeau will be one of the best coaches in the game and he will gain at least one championship