If you want Irving you would have to give up Favors or Hayward plus a draft pick... That's the truth and do not think optherwise because if Cavs were going trade Kyrie they can get a whole lot better options then Gobert. Talk about vastly overrating players.. SMH
No way. Seriously - if we gave Burke 31 MPG he'd have Irving's numbers or close to it. Also, Burke is a better 3-pt shooter than Irving and we all understand why Burke is our third-string PG.
Look at what Mack did to Irving (he almost had a triple-double and shut Irving down). Irving chucked it 7-23. And he went 6-22 his last game against Brooklyn. This trade is laughable and some Jazz fans don't consider defense. Heck, let's let Exum shoot the ball 25 times a game and I bet he'll make more than six shots. Plus Exum plays DEFENSE.
I'm no Kyrie fan, but you are missing the value he brings in a big way. The Burke analogy is preposterous. And you have cherry picked his worst games.
**** no. I don't trade Favors for Irving, I may trade Gobert for him, maybe. IF they throw in a pick or 2.With Lyles possibly a long-term solution at PF and with more range than Favors, do you trade Favors and Burke for Kyrie?