What's new

Hypotheticals if Jazz get pick #2 or 3

idiot

Well-Known Member
These are based partially on the idea that trade value is often never higher than at draft time, and that trade value for a talented player who lands in a logjam situation is often depressed (see Kanter). Also, there’s an argument to be made that the Jazz might be better off getting a player who helps accelerate the wins quicker to help keep Hayward and others home at their next FA round.

And I’m assuming that the general consensus here is that Russell would be our first choice based on fit/readiness to contribute. Let’s also assume that before draft date we’ve arranged with Tomic to join the Jazz. (OK, so I’m making 1 in 1,000 assumptions. Just play along.)

If Jazz have 2nd pick and Russell went #1, would you trade the pick for (either of):
  • Jabari (last year’s second for this year’s)
  • Giannis

If the Jazz have the 3rd pick, and Russell is gone, would you trade for:
  • Beal

If Jazz have 3rd pick, Russell is gone, would you approve if the Jazz managed to trade whoever they pick for one of these restricted free agents in a later sign and trade (I recognize that this is a near-impossibility):
  • Butler
  • Leonard
  • Draymond Green
  • Middleton

Would any of the possible trading partners be interested? I’m guessing that probably only Bucks and Spurs (if they bow out meekly this year) might have serious interest.

If you would be interested in the broad parameters of any of the possible trades, what should be thrown in (from one or both sides) to make the trade as worthwhile for both teams as possible?

Are there other possible trades to make with a second or third pick if we weren’t thrilled with the options there? For example, how far down would you swap picks with another team and what would you expect in return?
 
If we get the #1, #2, or #3 pick, keep it. No question about it. Keep it. Draft BPA. Win titles. Rookies are too cheap to trade away.
 
I would not trade the #2 pick for Giannis (very, very overrated) or Jabari (doesn't fit with us).
I would not trade the #3 pick for any of your players, because I'd expect Okafor, Towns or Russell to be better than any of those players.

I MIGHT consider #3 for Beal. MIGHT. I'd have to look into it more.
 
Keep it. Draft BPA. Win titles. Rookies are too cheap to trade away.

Don't totally disagree, except that it's the extremely rare player on a rookie contract who really contributes to a title. Just doesn't happen often. For us, I think there's a reasonable argument that Russell might be the only one who could make that sort of contribution. By the time they are a huge title contributor, in most cases, they're off their rookie contracts.
 
If we get the #1, #2, or #3 pick, keep it. No question about it. Keep it. Draft BPA. Win titles. Rookies are too cheap to trade away.

Kawhi Leonard would automatically make us a contender for years to come. No one would ever score on us and he would vault our ability to turn over teams other and secure rebounds. He doesn't affect our ability to give Gobert the 5-year max either.
 
Also, Kahwi's max deal is going to look cheap as **** in 2 years. It would be one of the most tradeable contracts in the NBA in case you decided to move him towards the end of his deal.
 
I think Quin Snyder and his team has shown an uncanny ability to train up young guys & rookies and make the team competitive. Our records are 8-1 so far after All Stars break with like 7 rookies in the team? Are you kidding me????


Keep the pick and let it rip.
 
I think Quin Snyder and his team has shown an uncanny ability to train up young guys & rookies and make the team competitive. Our records are 8-1 so far after All Stars break with like 7 rookies in the team? Are you kidding me????


Keep the pick and let it rip.

So imagine what he could do with Kahwi, who is still a young dude and is already the best perimeter defender in the NBA.
 
Back
Top