What's new

I can’t afford this Trump economy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
Wow… I heard he went to Davis high school but I don’t know for sure. His latest video has like 70M views and he’s uncovered a serious network of major fraud in Minnesota. Crazy! Could you imagine if democrats had elected Waltz and his billions of fraud as the vice president? Holy ****.
Waltz is atop the worst fraud in potentially world history. Any remaining Democrats are the dumbest sheep in history.


View: https://x.com/nickshirleyy/status/2004642794862961123?s=46&t=PfGBft52CF1a98VsjZzilw
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PJF
You *******s still don’t have a spin for the Minnesota Somali fraud yet? You all still waiting for your opinions to be told to you?
I don’t see the 18% approval rating for democrats jumping but you retards here will still defend them. You’ve devoted your lives to being brain dead tds cultists. You can’t turn back now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PJF
Trump’s tariffs are a success? Muhahaha….

It is
inaccurate to say that imported goods are getting cheaper as a result of Trump's tariffs, and economists generally do not consider the tariffs a success based on this metric. The consensus among economic studies is that tariffs increase prices for both imported and domestically produced goods, with the costs largely borne by U.S. consumers and businesses.

Impact on Prices
  • Imported goods prices have increased: Studies show that tariffs have led to higher prices for imported goods. One working paper found that imported goods became about 4% more expensive shortly after the 2025 tariffs were introduced, relative to the pre-tariff trend.
  • Domestic goods prices have also increased: To remain competitive with the now more expensive imports, U.S. domestic producers also raised their prices. Retail prices have risen on average by about 4.9 percentage points relative to the pre-tariff trend across various categories, with higher increases for imported goods.
  • Cost passed to consumers: The tariffs are effectively a tax on imported goods, which U.S. importing companies pay to the federal government. Businesses have passed on a significant portion of these increased costs to consumers through higher retail prices. The Yale Budget Lab estimates the tariffs amount to an average tax increase per U.S. household of $1,400 in 2026.
  • Foreign firms not absorbing the cost: Contrary to the argument that foreign exporters would absorb the costs to maintain market share, evidence indicates that foreign producers have not significantly lowered their prices.
 
As expected by most, Trump’s tariff policy has proven to be a complete and total failure. Just one reason most Americans regard Trump’s handling of the economy an utter disaster.


Introducing the highest U.S. tariffs since the Great Depression, President Donald Trump made a clear promise in the spring: “Jobs and factories will come roaring back into our country.”

They haven’t.

Manufacturing employment has declined every month since what Trump dubbed “Liberation Day” in April, saying his widespread tariffs would begin to rebalance global trade in favor of American workers. U.S. factories employ 12.7 million people today, 72,000 fewer than when Trump made his Rose Garden announcement.

The trade measures that the president said would spur manufacturinghave instead hampered it, according to most mainstream economists. That’s because roughly half of U.S. imports are “intermediate” goods that American companies use to make finished products, like aluminum that is shaped into soup cans or circuit boards that are inserted into computers.

So while tariffs have protected American manufacturers like steel mills from foreign competition, they have raised costs for many others. Auto and auto parts employment, for example, has dipped by about 20,000 jobs since April.

“2025 should have been a good year for manufacturing employment, and that didn’t happen. I think you really have to indict tariffs for that,” said economist Michael Hicks, director of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State in Muncie, Indiana.
 
Well, I know one guy, and one family, and friends no doubt as well, who are loving the economy. At least $1.4 billion. That’s not bad, lol.


PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS never been a man to ask what he can do for his country. In his second term, as in his first, he is instead testing the limits of what his country can do for him.

He has poured his energy and creativity into the exploitation of the presidency — into finding out just how much money people, corporations and other nations are willing to put into his pockets in hopes of bending the power of the government to the service of their interests.

A review by the editorial board relying on analyses from news organizations shows that Mr. Trump has used the office of the presidency to make at least $1.4 billion. We know this number to be an underestimate because some of his profits remain hidden from public view. And they continue to grow.
 
What a surprise: “American consumers and importers absorbed 96%.”


Americans, not foreigners, are bearing almost the entire cost of U.S. tariffs, according to new research that contradicts a key claim by President Trump and suggests he might have a weaker hand in a reemerging trade war with Europe.

Trump has repeatedly claimed that his historic tariffs, deployed aggressively over the past year as both a revenue-raising and foreign-policy tool, will be paid for by foreigners. Such assertions helped to reinforce the president’s bargaining power and encourage foreign governments to do deals with the U.S.

Trump’s claims have been supported by the resilience of the U.S. economy, which recorded relatively brisk growth and moderate inflation last year, even as growth in Europe and other advanced economies remained sluggish.

The new research, published Monday by the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, a well-regarded German think tank, suggests that the impact of tariffs is likely to show up over time in the form of higher U.S. consumer prices.

The findings don’t mean that the tariffs are a win for Europe—on the contrary. German exports to the U.S., which have rocketed in recent years, have contracted sharply in the past year.

The German research echoes recent reports by the Budget Lab at Yale and economists at Harvard Business School, finding that only a small fraction of the tariff costs were being borne by foreign producers.

By analyzing $4 trillion of shipments between January 2024 and November 2025, the Kiel Institute researchers found that foreign exporters absorbed only about 4% of the burden of last year’s U.S. tariff increases by lowering their prices, while American consumers and importers absorbed 96%.
 
Back
Top