What's new
By:

I can't remember the last time I was happy with the NBA Champ.

I liked the Moses Malone, Danny Ainge, and James Worthy teams, before I noticed that the Lakers had an unfair advantage against other teams.
 
Best case scenario at this point is that either Dallas or Oklahoma City absolutely decimate the Heat or Bulls in the finals. I really don't care which team comes out of the East just as long as they get swept.
 
GlassEater said:
Agree. I'm really hoping Boozer doesn't get a cheap ring, though. But better to have Rose & Co than Miami.
Click to expand...

Boozer would not be the first to ride coat tails of far better players to a championship. I have no issues with this Bulls team winning it all. I like Rose and the Utah Jazz part 2 contingent far better than Miami.

I think it would be cool to see OKC win it all. Finally some new blood. For me it is just boring and old that the same teams always win.
 
If only the Boozer haters could realize how ridiculous they sound.

Bulls win a ring = Boozer rode the coat tails

Bulls lose = Boozer's fault

Seriously, take your auditions for MSNBC somewhere else.
 
Sloanfeld said:
If only the Boozer haters could realize how ridiculous they sound.

Bulls win a ring = Boozer rode the coat tails

Bulls lose = Boozer's fault

Seriously, take your auditions for MSNBC somewhere else.
Click to expand...

Actually if the Bulls lose it is D Rose's fault. Boozer does not have a big enough impact to influence whether they win or lose.
 
Sloanfeld said:
If only the Boozer haters could realize how ridiculous they sound.

Bulls win a ring = Boozer rode the coat tails

Bulls lose = Boozer's fault

Seriously, take your auditions for MSNBC somewhere else.
Click to expand...

26 minutes from Boozer in game 1....

what a star.
 
LogGrad98 said:
Actually if the Bulls lose it is D Rose's fault. Boozer does not have a big enough impact to influence whether they win or lose.
Click to expand...

So you're predetermined that it's Derrick Rose's fault if the Bulls lose? So what you're saying is, he can average 30 and 10 on 50% shooting and low turnovers, and it would be his fault?

What in the hell????
 
Sloanfeld said:
So you're predetermined that it's Derrick Rose's fault if the Bulls lose? So what you're saying is, he can average 30 and 10 on 50% shooting and low turnovers, and it would be his fault?

What in the hell????
Click to expand...

Yep that is exactly right. Everything bad that happens in Chicago is D Roses fault. Prostitution? D Roses fault. Organized crime? D Roses fault. Bulls losing? D Roses fault. Losing at that level is always on the shoulder of your best players. They did not get there by riding everyone elses MVP season. Certainly not Boozers. With D Rose the Bulls will rise or fall.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top