What's new

ICE Shooting in Minnesota

“We say black is white. Agree, or you are a criminal”.


The killings in Minneapolis of Renee Good and Alex Pretti have been compared to the murder of George Floyd, because they all happened within a few miles of one another, and because of the outrage they inspired. There’s an important difference, though: In 2020 the United States was in turmoil, but it was still a state of law. Floyd’s death was followed by investigation, trial, and verdict—by justice. The Minneapolis Police Department was held accountable and ultimately made to reform.

No one should expect justice for Good and Pretti. Today, nothing stands in the way of the brutal tactics of ICE and the Border Patrol. While President Trump seems to be trying to defuse the mayhem he’s caused by reassigning a top commander, he is not withdrawing the federal agents from the state or allowing local authorities to investigate, let alone prosecute, them for their actions.

Authoritarianism doesn’t disappear with the news cycle. The administration’s automatic lies about the killings and slander of the victims are less a cover-up of facts than a display of utter contempt for them. Trump, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, FBI Director Kash Patel, and other top officials seem to invite incredulity as a way to flex their power: We say black is white. Agree or you’re a criminal. When Stephen Miller recently claimed that geopolitics is ruled by the “iron laws” of “strength” and “force,” he was expressing the administration’s approach to domestic governance as well. Those words are iron laws on American streets.

The prelude to the violence of January 7 and 24 came not in Minneapolis on May 25, 2020, but in Washington, D.C., on January 6, 2021. Trump and his supporters were prevented from stealing an election and overthrowing the Constitution by democratic institutions—Congress, the courts, the police, the media, and public opinion. But the insurrection never ended. By the time Trump returned to power and pardoned the insurrectionists, almost half of the country believed that January 6 was a patriotic demonstration, a false-flag operation, or just no big deal. Throughout 2025, institutions that once restrained the presidency weakened or fell away one by one, until earlier this month Trump told The New York Times that the only limit to his power is his own mind. That same day, January 7, authoritarianism had its predictable consequence in freezing Minneapolis with the execution of Renee Good.

If rogue federal agents can shoot American citizens dead with total impunity, then it doesn’t matter whether state and local authorities, the courts, the media, the political opposition, and a mobilized public object. “ICE > MN,” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth wrote on social media—an assertion of raw force, not constitutional authority. When Trump and his loyalists call protesters terrorists and warn that disobeying orders will get you killed, they strip away any illusion that the federal government respects the lives, let alone the rights, of those who oppose it—potentially half the population or more.

A lawless regime is an illegitimate one. If the country seems to have reached a breaking point in Minneapolis, this is why. And yet Minneapolis also offers a compelling answer to the question that democracy-loving Americans have asked for the past year: What can I do?
 
Another day another blatant hoax for the Domestic terrorist. If you look carefully you can see the moron has his gun on him attacking federal officers. What a complete dumba$ and Democrats think he's some hero. Not attacking federal officers is not rocket science to most people. Not a criminal? 100% a criminal as attacking federal law enforcement is illegal and especially being illegally (no id on him, no permit and attacking ICE)armed and violent.

How Democrats always make the thugs the victims is astonishing. They're far more angry about dumb people attacking federal agents then people like Laken Riley who was brutally beaten to death by an illegal for walking. A nurse beaten to death for nothing. No riots, no attacking feds and playing victim.... Nothing.

View: https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/2016635209207152662?s=20
 
Last edited:
Another day another blatant hoax for the Domestic terrorist. If you look carefully you can see the moron has his gun on him attacking federal officers. What a complete dumba$ and Democrats think he's some hero. Not attacking federal officers is not rocket science to most people. Not a criminal? 100% a criminal as attacking federal law enforcement is illegal and especially being illegally (no id on him, no permit and attacking ICE)armed and violent.

How Democrats always make the thugs the victims is astonishing. They're far more angry about dumb people attacking federal agents then people like Laken Riley who was brutally beaten to death by an illegal for walking. A nurse beaten to death for nothing. No riots, no attacking feds and playing victim.... Nothing.

View: https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/2016635209207152662?s=20

I see a bunch of thugs in that video and none of them are Pretti.

You watch that video and your concern is with the way Pretti acts? Those ICE agents are incompetent and hostile. Real police do not conduct themselves like that at all. The ICE agents are dangerous clowns.
 
I see a bunch of thugs in that video and none of them are Pretti.

You watch that video and your concern is with the way Pretti acts? Those ICE agents are incompetent and hostile. Real police do not conduct themselves like that at all. The ICE agents are dangerous clowns.
Yes... The guy was there to start trouble for ICE and his sole intention was getting in the way of them arresting child rapist, drug dealers, and other violent criminals. But hey... by all means go find a "real police" with someone pulled over and make sure you're armed. While he's conducting his arrest make sure you go push him out of the way and interfere with his arrest. You're getting tackled and potentially shot. This is common sense to most but not some apparently. Getting in the way and interfering with any law enforcement agency is sheer stupidity. Especially strapped. Dumb as a box of rocks.

Btw, this isn't happening in the other states because people are allowing ICE to do what they were voted to do. The only state this is happening is a state that is the at the epicenter of massive fraud where people like Ilhan Omar made like 20 million in a single year on a wine factory that literally doesn't even exist. Not to mention the billions upon billions being funneled through the "Learing Center" and THOUSANDS of other fake businesses that forced Tim Walz to retire.

These militants are extremely well coordinated and well funded. He was there in duty on both occasions with the very intent on disrupting federal law. All to protect some pretty terrible criminals. Let's not forget that this dufous would still be alive today if Walz and Frey allowed the police to help and arrest him in the first place but sadly they don't want peace.
 
Last edited:
Yes... The guy was there to start trouble for ICE and his sole intention was getting in the way of them arresting child rapist, drug dealers, and other violent criminals. But hey... by all means go find a "real police" with someone pulled over and make sure you're armed. While he's conducting his arrest make sure you go push him out of the way and interfere with his arrest. You're getting tackled and potentially shot. This is common sense to most but not some apparently. Getting in the way and interfering with any law enforcement agency is sheer stupidity. Especially strapped. Dumb as a box of rocks.

Btw, this isn't happening in the other states because people are allowing ICE to do what they were voted to do. The only state this is happening is a state that is the at the epicenter of massive fraud where people like Ilhan Omar made like 20 million in a single year on a wine factory that literally doesn't even exist. Not to mention the billions upon billions being funneled through the "Learing Center" and THOUSANDS of other fake businesses that forced Tim Walz to retire.

These militants are extremely well coordinated and well funded. He was there in duty on both occasions with the very intent on disrupting federal law. All to protect some pretty terrible criminals. Let's not forget that this dufous would still be alive today if Walz and Frey allowed the police to help and arrest him in the first place but sadly they don't want peace.
You are not a serious person. I don't think I could gain anything by engaging with you.

Have a nice life!
 
Interesting I didn't see Cooper use the video below where the moron begs, literally BEGS to be assaulted before he attacked a federal vehicle.

Showing this militant moron literally begging federal officers to "Assault me" while attacking a federal officer is trolling here? Who's not serious here? It's astounding that people think kicking a federal officers car all while begging to get assaulted by armed federal agents is not psychotic lolol. You cannot take such blatant naiveness seriously. Pretti was a dumb dumb person and he paid for it. Literally asked for it(LITERALLY) and Democrats think they can be taken seriously.... Keep in mind even his own parents knew how he was psychotic and told him not to anything stupid like he did weeks before.

Whoever quoted me, explain to me how running up on ICE begging for them to assault him all while kicking out a taillight is good if you don't mind. Be honest please. Also please tell me why Minneapolis is the only city with violent riots AGAIN while illegal child rapist and such are being arrested in other states without people begging to be assaulted. If ICE is the problem why is it only fraud ridden Minneapolis? Hopefully Cooper has a video explaining this.

View: https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/2016718402920870350?s=20
 
Last edited:
Who's not serious here?
You. You are conflating the two incidents. Here is a hypothetical scenario, that your take would indicate you would approve of, if it had happened this way:

Pretti is involved in an incident, in which he kicks the rear of an ICE vehicle, and breaks a taillight.

Sometime later, a week or so, he’s involved in another incident. All half dozen videos of that later incident show that he did not brandish his legal conceal carry, did not attempt to attack agents, tried to prevent getting pepper sprayed, tried to protect a woman whom Border Patrol had violently pushed to the ground, trying to protect her from pepper spray and trying to lift her off the ground.

Again, we see an agent remove Pretti’s gun, and trot away with it. Only then is Pretti shot. That’s an execution, whether you like it or not.

But wait! You actually relate it to the earlier incident. In order to justify him dying. So, you must be suggesting the following:

The Border Patrol agents might have recognized him, or told about him(?) from that previous incident. Like yourself, they decided if anything truly bad were to happen to him now, it would be his fault, and his fault alone. So, two of the agents shot him 9 times. He was unarmed. But he yelled at them a week or two earlier. “He should not have done so. We can kill him.” You’re suggesting, that IF that’s what they were thinking as they threw him to the ground, if they were conflating the two incidents, just as YOU are, that, to YOU, it’s OK that he was killed, because we certainly cannot blame the agents who pumped 9 bullets, some from several feet away, into an unarmed man.

Or, you’re simply saying this: he had an earlier incident in which he was violent toward ICE agents. Therefore, even though that earlier incident was not even known to these agents, probably the more likely scenario, we, the onlooking American must surely understand that that earlier unrelated incident must be factored in! He brought this on himself! We MUST consider that earlier incident when judging an incident in which 9 bullets are pumped into him while he’s unarmed and no danger to anybody! No, of course we must not do that! Not if we have half a brain!

That’s effed up! It wouldn’t matter if he had pissed on an agent in that previous incident! He could have pissed in an agent’s face, and it would NEVER justify pumping 9 bullets into an unarmed man!

Whether you know it or not, you are trying to justify Border Patrol executing him because he screamed at them, kick one of the government vehicles, and broke a taillight.

You are saying we should not be at all surprised that they unloaded 9 bullets into him, all because he broke a taillight and confronted agents earlier. Most Americans, at this point would not agree with you that ANY previous incident justify executing him.

But I’ve no doubt you’re serious in believing he deserved to be executed. MAGA and many Republicans may not go as far as you do, but…

It’s so much about the cruelty for folks like yourself. Beginning with Trump and Miller.


But a new report by the Public Religion Research Institute reveals something even more troubling about Trump’s MAGA base and the extremes to which they will go to support his mass deportation campaign and larger project to Make America White Again and creating what would be a de facto police state in America.

  • For example, a majority of Americans (61%) agree that “immigrants, regardless of legal status, should have basic rights and protections such as the ability to challenge their deportation before a judge in court.” But only 37% of Republicans agree with this basic principle of American democracy, the Constitution and the rule of law.
  • A majority of Republicans also support arresting and detaining immigrants who do not have a criminal record. Most Americans and the vast majority of Democrats (88%) oppose such a policy.
  • Republicans, by a large majority (69%), also support putting “illegal immigrants” in internment camps until they can be removed from the country.
  • Predictably, a majority of Republicans also want “illegal aliens” to be sent to foreign prisons, or gulags, in such countries as El Salvador, Rwanda and Libya without due process. A majority of Americans (68%) and an overwhelming majority of Democrats (90%) oppose such inhumane policies.
This is my new favored image to convey the Evil present in the Trump administration. What does it convey? Probably nothing to most. But, to me, it shows the heart of pure Nazi Evil, there it is, looming in the background, the hate filled mastermind of the extreme cruelty being practicing by these fascists. There he is, Donald Trump once telling reporters “I guess I better not tell you what he REALLY thinks”, that’s a paraphrase, but we all knew what he was saying, because Miller has made it quite clear he’s a hate filled white supremacist and white nationalist Nazi. Heck, at the Charlie Kirk memorial, Miller plagiarized a speech by Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels, who he could be the twin of! So there he as, glaring, just as Trump is talking to reporters, and softening his rhetoric on Pretti, and I’ll bet Miller is thinking “don’t go too far, the cruelty is a dream come true!”.

No need to reply. You have no argument at all. I am through with you. Saying breaking a taillight makes a man eligible for a state sponsored public execution just tells me you are a very, very sick puppy.

IMG_7395.webp

Miller plagiarized a speech by Joseph Goebbels. Pretty sure Hitler’s propaganda minister is one of Miller’s personal heros:

IMG_7289.jpeg
 
Last edited:
You. You are conflating the two incidents. Here is a hypothetical scenario, that your take would indicate you would approve of, if it had happened this way:

Pretti is involved in an incident, in which he kicks the rear of an ICE vehicle, and breaks a taillight.

Sometime later, a week or so, he’s involved in another incident. All half dozen videos of that later incident show that he did not brandish his legal conceal carry, did not attempt to attack agents, tried to prevent getting pepper sprayed, tried to protect a woman whom Border Patrol had violently pushed to the ground, trying to protect her from pepper spray and trying to lift her off the ground.

Again, we see an agent remove Pretti’s gun, and trot away with it. Only then is Pretti shot. That’s an execution, whether you like it or not.

But wait! You actually relate it to the earlier incident. In order to justify him dying. So, you must be suggesting the following:

The Border Patrol agents recognized him from that previous incident. Like yourself, they decided if anything truly bad were to happen to him now, it would be his fault, and his fault alone. So, two of the agents shot him 9 times.

Whether you know it or not, you are trying to justify Border Patrol executing him because he screamed at them, kick one of the government vehicles, and broke a taillight.

You are saying we should not be at all surprised that they unloaded 9 bullets into him, all because he broke a taillight and confronted agents earlier. Most Americans, at this point would not agree with you that ANY previous incident justify executing him.

But I’ve no doubt you’re serious in believing he deserved to be executed. MAGA and many Republicans may not go as far as you do, but…

It’s so much about the cruelty for folks like yourself. Beginning with Trump and Miller.


But a new report by the Public Religion Research Institute reveals something even more troubling about Trump’s MAGA base and the extremes to which they will go to support his mass deportation campaign and larger project to Make America White Again and creating what would be a de facto police state in America.

  • For example, a majority of Americans (61%) agree that “immigrants, regardless of legal status, should have basic rights and protections such as the ability to challenge their deportation before a judge in court.” But only 37% of Republicans agree with this basic principle of American democracy, the Constitution and the rule of law.
  • A majority of Republicans also support arresting and detaining immigrants who do not have a criminal record. Most Americans and the vast majority of Democrats (88%) oppose such a policy.
  • Republicans, by a large majority (69%), also support putting “illegal immigrants” in internment camps until they can be removed from the country.
  • Predictably, a majority of Republicans also want “illegal aliens” to be sent to foreign prisons, or gulags, in such countries as El Salvador, Rwanda and Libya without due process. A majority of Americans (68%) and an overwhelming majority of Democrats (90%) oppose such inhumane policies.
This is my new favored image to convey the Evil present in the Trump administration. What does it convey? Probably nothing to most. But, to me, it shows the heart of pure Nazi Evil, there it is, looming in the background, the hate filled mastermind of the extreme cruelty being practicing by these fascists. There he is, Donald Trump once telling reporters “I guess I better not tell you what he REALLY thinks”, that’s a paraphrase, but we all knew what he was saying, because Miller has made it quite clear he a hate filled whites supremacist Nazi. Heck, at the Charlie Kirk memorial, Miller plagiarized a speech by Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels, who he could be the twin of!

View attachment 20027
You completely ignored this. Why? I'll have a longer answer but you left this out intentionally I believe. This is undeniable evidence that he was there to start trouble and nothing else. Do you all know about him being part of a massive signal chat that sent out militants like him?

View: https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/2016718402920870350?s=20
 
RED: Pretti is involved in an incident, in which he kicks the rear of an ICE vehicle, and breaks a taillight.



Incident? No breaking federal law. So this proves that he was there as part of a network who’s entire purpose is to stop ICE from arresting child rapist, drug dealers, wife beaters and gang members. What you conveniently leave out is his BEGGING to be assaulted. Why did you leave that out purposefully? That’s proof that is indeed violent looking for trouble.



RED: Sometime later, a week or so, he’s involved in another incident. All half dozen videos of that later incident show that he did not brandish his legal conceal carry, did not attempt to attack agents, tried to prevent getting pepper sprayed, tried to protect a woman whom Border Patrol had violently pushed to the ground, trying to protect her from pepper spray and trying to lift her off the ground.



He literally interfered with the lady that was being arrested. No matter how you want to spin it, he did not belong there. If I see a cop arresting someone for something I don’t agree with that does not give me the right to interfere. Especially while having a weapon which is highly illegal. Even if you are right, he has no right to impede, none. Right?



RED: Again, we see an agent remove Pretti’s gun, and trot away with it. Only then is Pretti shot. That’s an execution, whether you like it or not.



We see him remove the gun as someone shouts “GUN GUN” all while he reaches for his empty holster The Sig which is notorious for misfiring appears to have misfired and started the entire thing. It was Pretti who put himself there by not only resisting but by interfering which he had no right to do. You can say whatever you like but it’s clear he had no fear on the agents as he attacked them a week prior.



RED: But wait! You actually relate it to the earlier incident. In order to justify him dying. So, you must be suggesting the following:



100%... It’s clear that his entire reason for being there was to interfere. We know this based off Signal chats that put him there both times. He didn’t deserve to die, but he is the reason he is dead. He broke the law multiple times, he interfered, he resisted all while armed.



Red: The Border Patrol agents recognized him from that previous incident. Like yourself, they decided if anything truly bad were to happen to him now, it would be his fault, and his fault alone. So, two of the agents shot him 9 times. He was unarmed. But he yelled at them a week or two earlier. “He should not have done so. We can kill him.” You’re suggesting, that IF that’s what they were thinking as they threw him to the ground, if they were conflating the two incidents, just as YOU are, that, to YOU, it’s OK that he was killed, because we certainly cannot blame the agents who pumped 9 bullets, some from several feet away, into an unarmed man.



They didn’t know he was armed still. An officer on the camera literally yells gun, because there is one and that’s when he was shot. Again this would’ve never happened if Pretti wasn’t there to cause trouble. You all think it’s a coincidence he was there but it’s not. He was there for the sole reason BOTH times to interfere.

I answered all your questions so I think it would be equally respectful to answer mine.
1. Why did you purposely leave our him BEGGING to be assaulted? I'm guessing because you would be agreeing that he wanted the trouble and even initiated it by attacking a vehicle and breaking a taillight.
2. Why aren't people getting shot in other states? Minnesota isn't even in the top 20 with deportations. Why is violence only happening there?
 
Last edited:
  • A majority of Republicans also support arresting and detaining immigrants who do not have a criminal record. Most Americans and the vast majority of Democrats (88%) oppose such a policy.
I don't remember Democrats caring when Obama was doing this in the "internment camps" HE BUILT where kids actually suffered immensely, were ridden with lice and had to sleep on concrete. He was faaaar more cruel than Trump. Democrats have no actual morals. Blaming Trump for Obama's internment camps lol.


View: https://x.com/NJBeisner/status/1933021690214428870?s=20


View: https://x.com/the_17thletter4/status/2016295733289222560?s=20


View: https://x.com/JodyChaseTN/status/2016376678176489885?s=20
 
Last edited:
Ok so maybe the democrats weren’t using illegal aliens for votes. Maybe it was just so they can use them for government assistance programs where they can siphon off a bunch of taxpayer money and fund themselves, like we see in Minnesota. Maybe that’s the only reason? Its so strange that these brain dead cultist democrats will defend the criminals and fraud for their overlords with their pathetic lives.
 
Back
Top