What's new

If, if, if?

actusreus

Well-Known Member
I know nobody can know, but if Walker were healthy, Nurk was playing like he is, and everyone else was playing every game (i.e., we were trying to win), is this a top 6 squad in this loaded West? Or would we still struggle to sniff the play in?
 
I know nobody can know, but if Walker were healthy, Nurk was playing like he is, and everyone else was playing every game (i.e., we were trying to win), is this a top 6 squad in this loaded West? Or would we still struggle to sniff the play in?
No, still not enough consistency among the back half of the rotation
 
I think we would be around 0.500, so pretty firmly be in the play in this year, but probably in the 9th or 10th place.
 
I know nobody can know, but if Walker were healthy, Nurk was playing like he is, and everyone else was playing every game (i.e., we were trying to win), is this a top 6 squad in this loaded West? Or would we still struggle to sniff the play in?
I think we would firmly be in the play in but not 6 seed level.
 
I want to believe if we were trying to win that Harkless would be getting more run (back when he was healthy). I think a Keyonte, Harkless, Ace, Lauri, Kessler lineup could be at least average defensively.
 
Definitely a play in team but the defense would keep us from getting in the top 6.
 
Back
Top