Hotdog
Well-Known Member
Iggy was great, played good defense on LeBron; played a really solid, fundamentally sound Finals series and produced, quite frankly, eye-popping numbers from a scoring standpoint in two of the games. To give him the MVP trophy over Curry is asinine. How much effort and game planning was designed to slow down IGGY or prevent him from destroying the Cleveland defense? Iggy was the beneficiary of a defense planned, executed, and designed to slow Curry, and only Curry. I've watched basketball for 25+ years and I'm not sure I've ever seen someone shoot that many threes with no one in the same county. Granted, he did hit a couple of tough shots over the course of the series, but mostly he had layups/dunks, and open threes. Lebron produced great overall numbers, but anyone that controls the ball like he did, should. He was extremely inefficient, and in many instances his defense/effort was deplorable. CURRY should have been the MVP.
Good post.
Even with Cleveland focusing all their energy on Curry, he still had better numbers than Iggy. Also, Iggy wasn't the only person who was guarding Lebron, who either did or didn't have a good series, depending on what angle you want to argue. It's either he played so good he should have been MVP, or its Iggy played such good defense he held him to a low FG%..
It's an easy choice from a stand point of watching the game and understanding what was going on, and from the boxscore. Curry was better than Iggy.