I'd like to offer some post-chat analysis. Here's a comment that I made:
12-02, 00:36 Sloanfeld jeffersuck is garbage tonight, but good thing he owned boozer so everyone can continue to overrate him
^^In this sentence, the subject of the sentence is JEFFERSON, meaning, the sentence was about Jefferson.
12-02, 00:37 Stickler nobody give a **** about boozer. take it elsewhere.
^^Stickler sees the word Boozer and disregards the rest of the sentence. He even ignores the fact that I pointed out that Jefferson owned Boozer (you guys would never admit to being wrong though).
12-02, 00:37 Stickler where does it end, Sloanfeld? Will you still be here this time next year nonsensically talking about Boozer?
^^More of the same.
12-02, 00:37 Sloanfeld dude my comment was about jefferson not boozer, moron
^^Sloaned
12-02, 00:38 Sloanfeld just because i said the word BOOZER doesnt mean it was the subject of my sentence
I don't understand why people can't comprehend what I write. It's sad really.