Interesting old article about Corbin and Kanter

[nightmare3983]

You must be Sherlock.

You must be a Moran.

 

[NAOS]

You must be a Moran.

Read the full thread you ****.

 

[NAOS]

I just don't think he is worth the risk.

The risk of Jefferson? Wowzers....

 

[nightmare3983]

Read the full thread you ****.

I did, but that isn't really necessary to see that only a Moran would talk about making "unrisky risks."

 

[NAOS]

I did, but that isn't really necessary to see that only a Moran would talk about making "unrisky risks."

You clearly didn't read, because I was making a joke. Or, have you also made a trollish turn?

Good times.

 

[Dr. Jones]

It makes me sad to see you guys fight.

 

[nightmare3983]

You clearly didn't read, because I was making a joke. Or, have you also made a trollish turn?

Good times.

Lame joke.

 

[nightmare3983]

It makes me sad to see you guys fight.

Pansy.

 

[Fishsticks]

Ohhhh I had a ton of risky risks in my 20's.

 

[Siro]

An unrisky risk wouldn't be a risk...

And what exactly did you think NAOS was saying? What did you think all that stuff about unicorns and rainbows was all about?

You could have just admitted to having not read his post past "unrisky risk" and moved on. But nooo, you had to battle it out.

I don't get some people.

 

[nightmare3983]

And what exactly did you think NAOS was saying? What did you think all that stuff about unicorns and rainbows was all about?

You could have just admitted to having not read his post past "unrisky risk" and moved on. But nooo, you had to battle it out.

I don't get some people.

No, I read the unicorn crap. But since the unrisky risk came before that, it wasn't clear if it was intentional or not.

 

[NAOS]

No, I read the unicorn crap. But since the unrisky risk came before that, it wasn't clear if it was intentional or not.

You're still flailing.

What came first?