What's new

It's happening bros...

May be if the Bucks move Henson, the lack of front court players will give them an incentive to go with 1st rounder & Middleton for Kanter:

Alex Kennedy ‏@AlexKennedyNBA 14m14 minutes ago
Sources say the Bucks may be willing to move John Henson if he could help them make a splashy addition (such as Reggie Jackson/Ty Lawson).
 
We don't need Henson, already have defensive bigs with Gobert & Favors.
Seems like he'd be a good fit to play 18-20 mins behind Gobert at the 5. Booker gets all the mins behind Favors at PF.

If they won't part with Middleton, I'd ask for their 1st, but negotiate down to Henson and Inglis. Henson is a solid rotation player and Inglis is a decent prospect.
 
Seems like he'd be a good fit to play 18-20 mins behind Gobert at the 5. Booker gets all the mins behind Favors at PF.

As much as we'd like to hate kanter, he'd still have much more potential than Henson.. IMO ...



I do like Middleton and a 1st though.. I'd do that in a heart beat.
 
It'll be funny if Kanter actually buys into the Jazz and makes big strides and we all start loving him.
 
It'll be funny if Kanter actually buys into the Jazz and makes big strides and we all start loving him.

GTFO with that positivity... That **** ain't welcome here!
 
As much as we'd like to hate kanter, he'd still have much more potential than Henson.. IMO ...



I do like Middleton and a 1st though.. I'd do that in a heart beat.

Of course Kanter has more potential than Henson. We're dealing from a position of weakness. He doesn't want to stay and - at most - we have him for one more season at the QO. But do we really want to invest 25 mins/per in him next season, knowing that he'll leave as a free agent?

There isn't a chance in HELL Milwaukee is giving up Middleton AND a 1st. And probably not a chance they'd even consider giving up Middleton straight up. Any team acquiring Kanter faces the same risk we do - that he'll just sign the QO and become an UFA. Kanter simply doesn't have this insane value many wish he did.
 
Of course Kanter has more potential than Henson. We're dealing from a position of weakness. He doesn't want to stay and - at most - we have him for one more season at the QO. But do we really want to invest 25 mins/per in him next season, knowing that he'll leave as a free agent?

There isn't a chance in HELL Milwaukee is giving up Middleton AND a 1st. And probably not a chance they'd even consider giving up Middleton straight up. Any team acquiring Kanter faces the same risk we do - that he'll just sign the QO and become an UFA. Kanter simply doesn't have this insane value many wish he did.

I can't see them doing Middleton. I could see a kanter for their pick and maybe getting Inglis (really intriguing French dude). I'm not sure Inglis will ever crack their wing rotation... Might be a starter for us right now. There is something there but I think Middleton is part of their LT core.
 
I can't see them doing Middleton. I could see a kanter for their pick and maybe getting Inglis (really intriguing French dude). I'm not sure Inglis will ever crack their wing rotation... Might be a starter for us right now. There is something there but I think Middleton is part of their LT core.

Lockes head would explode if we got inglis. Ingles, inglis, Burke, burks, Elijah millsap. Half the roster would confound Ron Boone on the daily.
 
Back
Top