I dont really get why we consistently play 5-6 feet away from the ball above the break, and then stay glued to the ground when contesting shots taken from there. Its as if we are afraid of driving so much that we just simply allow the other team to play lazy offense and sling 3s at will.
Theoretically above the break 3s arent great shots but you shouldnt hand them out free like halloween candies. I may have to run through some statistics on this, but it feels true that we give poorly contested early clock 3 pointers more than any other team in the league.
Oh wow its worse than I thought.
Shot clock analysis:
We allow a total of 41.0 three point attempts per game (2nd most in the NBA to Pelicans 42.0)
In 22-18 clock range we allow 6.4 attempts (2nd most to Knicks)
In 18-15 clock range we allow 8.6 attempts (2nd most to Knicks)
In 15-7 clock range we allow 19.5 attempts (6th most)
In 7-4 clock range we allow 3.4 attempts (13th most)
In 4-0 clock range we allow 2.8 attempts (27th most)
So despite allowing 2nd most three pointers we are near the bottom in late clock 3s against and near the very top in all early clock ranges. Thats not great. What about contesting 3P shots?
Closest defender analysis:
We allow the 2nd most "wide open (6ft+)" threes with 24.6 (Pels #1 with 24.9)
We allow 9th most "open (4-6ft)" threes with 14.6 per game
We rank DEAD LAST in "tight (2-4 ft)" threes with 1.9 per game
Our opponents have taken ZERO "very tight (0-2ft)" threes against us all year (naturally raking us last in that category as well)
Thats just absolutely horrible. NBA average for 3 pointers taken per game league wide is 37.0 per basketball reference. We allow 39.2 threes that classify as "wide open" or "open", while not even forcing any time pressure on those shots.