What's new
By:

Jazz 2017/18 Playoff Bus! All Aboard!

hgb said:
Have you seen this confirmed anywhere?
Click to expand...

I just read that Lillard said he is going to be careful with the playoff looming. I'm guessing he'll miss a few games if not all. Haven't seen confirmation that he will rest the remaining regular season games.
 
fishonjazz said:
And none of the losses were blowouts..... The jazz could have won every one of the games they lost. San Antonio, Atlanta, and boston easily could have been wins if a shot or two goes in or if a ball bounces the jazz way once or twice or they get a few favorable calls.
Click to expand...
But you could say the same about some narrow wins over crappy teams. What happens if Gasol plays the last quarter? What happens if Gobert doesnt get a game saving block? Jazz have been struggling. They've been playing against teams missing multiple starters and still fighting for W's. Minnesota without Teague and Butler should have been easy...and it was. But Lakers was a dogfight; even with Rubio and Mitchell shooting well, the short-handed, sub .500 Lakers should have been a walk in the park. Same with the Celtics and numerous other teams in March and April.

The thing no one mentions here is that by allowing inferior teams to hang close there are no garbage time mins, no chance to rest the starters. You wonder how much better Mitchell, Gobert or Ingles could be if they could occasionally sit out entire 4th quarters.
 
Last edited:
Jack Strop said:
But you could say the same about some narrow wins over crappy teams. What happens if Gasol plays the last quarter? What happens if Gobert doesnt get a game saving block? Jazz have been struggling. They've been playing against teams missing multiple starters and still fighting for W's. Minnesota without Teague and Butler should have been easy...and it was. But Lakers was a dogfight; even with Rubio and Mitchell shooting well, the short-handed, sub .500 Lakers should have been a walk in the park. Same with the Celtics and numerous other teams in March and April.
Click to expand...

In the last month or so we've won a ton of games, a few of them blowouts, and lost a couple of close ones. If that's what struggling looks like sign me tf up.

To add to this OKC, Minnesota, New Orleans and San Antonio are all right around .500 since the start of March. I'm sure they'd trade places with this 'struggling' team in a heartbeat.
 
Last edited:
Zombie said:
In the last month or so we've won a ton of ganes, a few of them blowouts, and lost a couple of close ones. If that's what struggling looks like sign me up.
Click to expand...
This.
 
One point or one hundred points, a win is a win! Against a scrub team or a title contender they all count, but I agree it would be nice to get the starters a little more rest. On the flip side, they are learning to win under pressure.
 
FarrakhanJazzFan said:
Drawing OKC isn't a great prize. I heard on a Ringer podcast that Golden State is terrified at landing them in the first round. That said, OKC could pull off an upset of GS in the first round when GS is without Curry. If the Jazz were to land the 3 seed and win their first round series against, say, Minnesota or New Orleans (Minnesota scares me too with Butler), then OKC would sure be preferable to Golden State or Houston in the second round.
Click to expand...

Portland and OKC are both tough but I’m not scared of OKC at all. Carmelo is toast and they don’t have enough shooting. Good defense and Adams gives Gobert some issues but not particularly well coached... I think we’d beat them and I’m not sure why GS would be afraid of them.

Westbrook is a buzzsaw but he could wear out or the other guys do so much watching that it throws their rythymn.

Porty is tough too and with a healthy Dame we could be in trouble.

I think we have a better shot at beating OKC than Portland.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top